jodi arias TAKES THE STAND FOR 14TH DAY #69*may contain graphic and adult content*

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
What does it even matter when she hurt her finger? She admitted to killing him. So what if she hurt it during the altercation? I don't get it.

She used the finger to prove he abused her. It was the only physical proof she has. Problem is she has already admitted to Flores that it came from the knife. jmo
 
The defense team also could have, several years ago, searched for The Gun. It is the main part of her "self defense" claim. They have Jodi (who could give the general location). They have power to hire investigators to search for it.
It could prove, IF found:
A. It was not grandpas gun (huge argument against premeditation)
B. serial # could prove if purchased by Travis or someone close to him who may have given it to him for protection.

It seems they never looked

There is only one reason for them not looking ...
 
Just popping in to say thank you for all the requests to chip in on the jewelry for Beth. I just had the cash and thought it was kind of complicated to figure out chipping in with this many people. I originally bought it to give her myself but then thought it had more of a "punch" for her right now to feel the support of loads of people here behind her.

If you'd like to contribute though I'd ask you to send money to Travis' family. They have huge expenses and need it more than me.

This is a good link (spoke with Tanisha yesterday who verified this is the correct address to send paypal donations):

justice4travisalexander@gmail.com



Thank you! :seeya:


I'm working my day job all day today so won't be in court. Tomorrow and Thurs, yes in the afternoons.
 
1. Was there any real proof offered that it was her finger photographed?

2. Can someone fill me in briefly on the 'torn out' pages of the journal, please. Were they shown in court?

I switched the live stream off yesterday. Nurmi was truly coming across as a sexual pervert, and I got very nauseous.

I know it's not polite to quote one's own post, but please, can anyone answer these two questions before this thread gets crazy busy. :please:
 
Is it true that the Judge can instruct the jury to consider lesser charges?? Gosh I hope not. I hope the Judge doesn't bend backwards for the defense AGAIN.
 
Why did JM not go further with the messages in the magazines?

He has to put someone on the stand to say they were the person who was meant to get the messages. Juan knows who that person is and it is speculated it is MM. Juan would not have already brought those magazine in unless he had a statement from MM. My guess is they put pressure on him to tell the truth. While he claims he would lie for her I think the threat of a jail sentence would be an incentive to tell the truth. jmo
 
I know it's not polite to quote one's own post, but please, can anyone answer these two questions before this thread gets crazy busy. :please:


Not sure there is any way to prove if that is her finger (right finger) or when the pic was really taken.

Haven't seen the torn out pages....don't think they exist.

Yes, Nurmi made my skin crawl yesterday. Total perv vibe.
 
Ravish - to give great delight to, enrapture (from Free Online Dictionary)

I believe the word is RAVAGE

Ravage:
transitive verb: to wreak havoc on : affect destructively <a land ravaged by war>
intransitive verb: to commit destructive actions
 
I read an article last year that said the practice of anal sex is on the rise. The theory is that men are becoming more interested in and more practiced at satisfying women, and that when a woman is really enjoying sex she may be willing to try more things.

...and I highly suspect the author was male.

I think it has more to do with a factoid I just learned last week at a school seminar for parents, provided by Internet security specialists-- they quoted that as of 2012, over 53% of ALL Internet content on the planet was dedicated to sex or *advertiser censored*.

Over half. Ick.
 
Looking forward to not watching the Arias snoozefest today! Reading the court observers is 1000% better and more interesting, so that's my strategy until Juan's rebuttal. :rockon:
 
She used the finger to prove he abused her. It was the only physical proof she has. Problem is she has already admitted to Flores that it came from the knife. jmo

She has now told so many stories about her fingers to so many people that I think the entire finger business could be thrown out completely by the jury.

Esp since there is ZERO corroboration to this "kicking injury" . The only evidence comes in from an admitted and known pathological liar.
 
I know it's not polite to quote one's own post, but please, can anyone answer these two questions before this thread gets crazy busy. :please:

No, to the first question, just her testimony saying it was her finger. Q2: Jodi admitted to tearing out the pages and just said they were negative thoughts and as an afterthought she decided to remove them. And, I think that was pretty much it. jmo
 
He has to put someone on the stand to say they were the person who was meant to get the messages. Juan knows who that person is and it is speculated it is MM. Juan would not have already brought those magazine in unless he had a statement from MM. My guess is they put pressure on him to tell the truth. While he claims he would lie for her I think the threat of a jail sentence would be an incentive to tell the truth. jmo

Thanks!
 
One word: *advertiser censored*.

Do you mean women watching *advertiser censored*? Or men? I can see women becoming more familiar with the idea, but there's no way in hell I'd want to try most of the things that are out there. :floorlaugh: This was just a theory I read about that was trying to explain why more women would agree to something that doesn't sound like it would be much fun for them. In a way, it makes sense: your partner makes an effort to satisfy you, so you make more of an effort to satisfy them.
 
If I hear JAs voice say "Remember that time, I fell asleep in your chair" again.....grrr....
 
He has to put someone on the stand to say they were the person who was meant to get the messages. Juan knows who that person is and it is speculated it is MM. Juan would not have already brought those magazine in unless he had a statement from MM. My guess is they put pressure on him to tell the truth. While he claims he would lie for her I think the threat of a jail sentence would be an incentive to tell the truth. jmo

Someone posted several days ago that at the evidentiary hearing for the forged pedo letters Juan told MM that if he brought the letters up at trial he'd file perjury charges before MM's "feet him the floor" from the witness stand. I'm pretty sure the wrath of an angry Juan is more than enough to persuade MM of the merits of telling the truth.
 
I don't get why the DT doesn't at this point just get an x ray of the finger. Would a medical exam prove how long the injury has occurred? At this point, it's like, just do the subpoena, it's got to be cheaper than indulging her lies.

The defense didn't get an x-ray of the finger because it wouldn't show that it was broken. The prosecution would have an almost impossible time telling her to get one since it's an "invasive" procedure (x-rays).
 
I think DT is just going to drag this on and on and on in the hopes of something triggering a mistrial . Here's hoping that today, the judge cracks down , sustains JM's valid objections, stops the defendant's monologues as well as her speaking for the victim AND stops letting in "evidence" that has recently surfaced or of suspect origins or has been heavily edited by the dt. There's a huge difference between being lenient over appeal concerns and what is now happening in that court room. JMO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
136
Guests online
1,642
Total visitors
1,778

Forum statistics

Threads
606,284
Messages
18,201,563
Members
233,797
Latest member
Mwaggoner16
Back
Top