887sMtreme
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2013
- Messages
- 1,469
- Reaction score
- 9,131
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@TeaTime
I hope you will understand what have you bought that way before going to your paradise.
For truth, it is my alone goal regarding half of population.
"So they know what they have bought."
[edit] btw. Why Patsy wrote "CIA" on her hand? She felt bigger then the "country it serves"?
This one, presumably. Note the tiny blistery-looking bumps directly above the "heart," and the intact fingernails -- which were noted in the autopsy report as being "long enough for clipping."
![]()
No bumps or blisters noted on the autopsy report.
That's true, and a little surprising to me because they're so clearly visible. Here's a detail from a higher-resolution photo, with handy arrow, that shows it a little better. You might need to zoom in a bit.
If you fiddle with this photo in Photoshop, there are parts of the "heart" that appear to be more like pokes or cuts than merely ink. I wonder what the instrument was that created the marks. Could have been a red fine-point Sharpie, as seen below, or a similar less-indelible Pilot Precise V5 extra fine. Both are commonly used in graphic design and for copy editing (hmmm) and are really sharp. They could easily scratch a child's soft skin if used with too much force. The marks look diffuse and faded enough to me to have been on JBR's hand for quite a while. If the ink were the more indelible in Sharpies, they could even have survived hand-washing. But those teeny blistery-looking things? Just weird.
Sorry to be so pedantic. Long, dull night here.
View attachment 129982View attachment 129983
That's true, and a little surprising to me because they're so clearly visible. Here's a detail from a higher-resolution photo, with handy arrow, that shows it a little better. You might need to zoom in a bit.
If you fiddle with this photo in Photoshop, there are parts of the "heart" that appear to be more like pokes or cuts than merely ink. I wonder what the instrument was that created the marks. Could have been a red fine-point Sharpie, as seen below, or a similar less-indelible Pilot Precise V5 extra fine. Both are commonly used in graphic design and for copy editing (hmmm) and are really sharp. They could easily scratch a child's soft skin if used with too much force. The marks look diffuse and faded enough to me to have been on JBR's hand for quite a while. If the ink were the more indelible in Sharpies, they could even have survived hand-washing. But those teeny blistery-looking things? Just weird.
Sorry to be so pedantic. Long, dull night here.
![]()
![]()
I'm not sure any testing of that was done, someone with more knowledge should be able to chime in on that. No, the autopsy report stated it as ink, or consistent with ink; I can't recall the direct phrasing. But to my eyes, it looks like the outer redness from a scratch, if that makes sense. I also don't see how he, or anyone, concluded that it's a heart. However, photographs have come a long way since 1996 so it could just be poor quality that makes it appear as such to me.
We agree 100%. I do hope someone can enlighten us on the scratch/ink. When I have some time in a day or two, I’ll dig around for that. Maybe acandyrose.com has something.
The bottom photo was taken with ultraviolet light(or something similar)
The same type of light to illuminate the presence of bodily fluids during autopsy. Does anyone else see the “stick-man”?![]()
![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
![]()
![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Yes, I do. Seeing as the area we were talking about is more visible, is that to say it is bodily fluids; blood? Given you've also referenced JBRs drawings, are you alluding to her drawing the stick figure. In bodily fluids? What's your thoughts on that? Saliva, blood, something else? Was this actually done during the autopsy?
I don’t believe the stick-man was drawn with bodily fluids. Rather, I believe the light just illuminates the bruising/scratches/pen indenting that was already embedded into her skin. Almost as if someone tried to perhaps erase what was drawn on her hand with nail polish remover. To the naked eye it would no longer show, but with the ultraviolet light it shows the indenting of what was there. I don’t believe it was JonBenet who drew on herself.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro