Josh Duggar charged with Receipt/Possession Child Sexual Abuse Material, 29 April 2021 #1

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, but why didn't the warehouse have windows? There has to be a reason there weren't any windows.
To prevent CPS , reporters, or anyone else to see that Josh and family were living there ?
Or was it to prevent the dad from having to pay $$ on another family residing there ; so that the dad's taxes wouldn't increase ?
There could be many other reasons-- that's just two.
I've felt in the past and maybe also the current times that the family patriarch is very protective of the now- adult children.
This can be a good thing, or maybe not ?
Imo.
 
Well…I found this….so Jim Bob should be investigated….also read that the building structure has to sit on a certain typed of flooring too….Jim Bob are you in compliance?

Every habitable room shall have at least one (1) window or skylight which can easily be opened, or such other device as will adequately ventilate the room.

ARTICLE V. | Code of Ordinances | Little Rock, AR





Municode Library
I

I believe he avoids compliance issues with this by having Josh and Anna list their address as being the big house, so even though they just live on the property they are considered to live in the house. That is the only way I can think of that he avoids issues with the warehouse safety because there has never been proof that it is a safe living situation.
 
WTH?! Sure, whatever.

TLC releases statement following allegations against former 19 Kids and Counting star Josh Duggar

Yeah, but Josh has been in the background, his wife, Anna Duggar, and his children have been on "Counting On". It is almost at the point of being ridiculous, they are filming the program, and Josh is "there", but literally "hiding" behind someone.

Oh, it's way past ridiculous, IMO. TLC profited off this family and likely knew some things weren't on the up and up and still kept going. They have carefully edited the shows to maximize the "reality" the Duggars wanted to show. They are just as responsible for enabling Josh as his parents are, again IMO.
 
In PA, you can not homeschool if a sex offender lives in the home, I believe you can’t homeschool if anyone has been charged with a felony as well, it may be in the last five years. (I homeschool in PA, but don’t pay close attention to the wording because it doesn’t apply to me.)

Is Josh Duggar a convicted sex offender? I thought he got off scot free.
He is not a convicted sex offender.
 
I

I believe he avoids compliance issues with this by having Josh and Anna list their address as being the big house, so even though they just live on the property they are considered to live in the house. That is the only way I can think of that he avoids issues with the warehouse safety because there has never been proof that it is a safe living situation.
Do you know for a fact there is no proof of it being a safe living situation?
 
He was not convicted of a crime. Legally he was allowed to live there.

Not trying to speak over anyone, but for me, it's more about Arkansas state homeschooling laws allowing children to be homeschooled in a home with an RSO in general rather than anything to do with Josh Duggar specifically. I think most people would argue that children shouldn't be allowed to be homeschooled in a home where an RSO lives (or live in a home with one at all) rather than just having "individualized guidance" to "deal with it". IMO.
 
I would think a barn/warehouse would be taxed at a lot lower rate than a second dwelling. Isn't there another son and his family living in another house on the property with a view of the big house? Maybe the tax assessor needs to pay a visit?
 
Not trying to speak over anyone, but for me, it's more about Arkansas state homeschooling laws allowing children to be homeschooled in a home with an RSO in general rather than anything to do with Josh Duggar specifically. I think most people would argue that children shouldn't be allowed to be homeschooled in a home where an RSO lives (or live in a home with one at all) rather than just having "individualized guidance" to "deal with it". IMO.
There is no question that a RSO should not live with or be in a home with children. I wish he had been charged with a crime when he violated his siblings and another girl. Things would have turned out differently for all involved. It seems very unfair. Maybe he felt he could get away with whatever he wanted because he had many enablers around him. JMO
 
But he wasn’t arrested or charged with sex crimes. Right or wrong, Anna apparently believed he was reformed. So he wasn’t breaking a law by being there. IMO.
I was focused on the law in Arkansas in general, not a specific situation. I can't believe homeschooling is allowed in a home with a registered sex offender.
 
The timing of this really interests me. Could it be related?

German police bust child sex abuse imagery network with 400,000 users - CNN

" *****
The online platform, which was known as Boystown and was hosted on the dark web, had 400,000 registered users when it was taken offline by an international taskforce.
The global team, spearheaded by the German Federal Criminal Police -- the Bundeskriminalamt (BKA) -- included the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and law enforcement agencies from the Netherlands, Sweden, Australia, Canada and the United States.
******"

Another (note the June 2019 at the latest start): https://www.usnews.com/news/world/a...r-massive-child-*advertiser censored*-website


"*****
The "BOYSTOWN" platform has existed since at least June 2019 and was only accessible via the so-called Darknet, the Frankfurt public prosecutor's office and the BKA Federal Police said in a statement.
******"
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
197
Guests online
667
Total visitors
864

Forum statistics

Threads
607,961
Messages
18,232,040
Members
234,255
Latest member
Zxywvut
Back
Top