Ive seen three people die. Two were wonderful and good hearted. Their passing over was close to beautiful.. like in the movies almost. Smiles, visions of their loved ones who had gone before them. One even reached his hand out and said "Grandma"...
The other was evil and had done unspeakable things to children, although never charged, I knew him for what he really was. In his final moments, his face contorted into a horrible grimace, so horrible there are no words to describe it. The best vision I can compare is the mask used in the horror film "Scream".. whatever he saw in his last moments were terrifying... and Ive never doubted since that moment that there is a very real place called Hell.
Im sure Josh is right there with him...
Whoa. And there it is.
But let me add. Even those who do not believe in an after life can agree that those who are evil, who have done nothing but wrong in their life, fear non-existence the most.
I need to understand this and maybe Gitana can help me but the question is this- If the Coxes could see he was a danger to them, We here at WS could see he was a danger to them, Kirsi could see it and the LE probably felt it Why didn't the courts see it? This last psychological eval where they recommended the new psycho sexual eval, why couldn't they see it? It should have been noted in the report.
Why weren't the visits in another place? All anybody had to do was listen to his ramblings, take a good look at him and see it?
Where did the ball drop here? I honestly think LE did all they could and you know the Grandparents did all they could, so where in the system was the problem? The judge, the dept of Social Services. (definitely not the poor social worker today, don't even go there)
I agree with all who said as long as there's evaluations left he should have had no contact. I do have to say that LE should have been an escort and they probably would have been glad to do so if needed.
Any parent who is the primary suspect in the murder of their girlfriend, wife or whatever should never have custody of the children till they are cleared? Is that what needs to be done?
I have not been this upset since Ethan Stacey and Zahra. There Ethan was put in the middle of abusers because this unhuman was his mother. What is the answer?
It all goes back to the constitution. Rights to one's children are constitutional rights. The right to be deemed innocent until proven guilty.
I respect that. I respect the constitution. But what about the children's rights? What about the victim's rights?
Most of us on here knew this case back to front. Thus, we knew what that creep was capable of and how sick and and dysfunctional his family was. I think that in cases so extreme as this, when there is a suspected murder, the least the court system and social services can do is be as educated as us. Do their homework and then protect the true innocent's rights before the suspect's are protected.
I have argued for years that children should never be placed or left in the custody of serious murder suspects. Let me add to that: The system needs to employ some people with a passion for justice, and for victims and their families, to have input in these cases and educate the system about the possible risks posed by suspects.
This is a horrible, evil thing that happened. Yes, perhaps he would have found a way, somehow, but the job of the system should have been to reduce all foreseeable risks. This was foreseeable, IMO. Anyone investigating this sick, sick family would know that the need for control, vengeance and cruelty were hallmarks of that monster. And they should have issued orders accordingly.