essies
"We're all just walking each other home." Ram Dass
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2008
- Messages
- 6,258
- Reaction score
- 5
Well, it's obvious that getting involved with the A's was beneficial to her "mental health diversion" ordered by the court!
So this "incident" happened in May of 2008. It looks like she was still dealing with the court issues on these charges when she started mingling with the A's. I'd say the A's have been really therapeutic for her fragile mental state...sarcasm intended.Well, it's obvious that getting involved with the A's was beneficial to her "mental health diversion" ordered by the court!![]()
So this "incident" happened in May of 2008. It looks like she was still dealing with the court issues on these charges when she started mingling with the A's. I'd say the A's have been really therapeutic for her fragile mental state...sarcasm intended.![]()
There is something very strange about this. All interviews begin with introductions and the time and date. That is missing here. They all end with a swearing in and ending time. This is also missing with the end seeming to stop mid sentence or thought. The pages are hand numbered so I don't see how part could be missing unless it was left out on purpose. The signature is right tight to the last interview line. Notice how all the other interviews end with 1-3 blank lines between the end of the interview and the normal signature.
Regardless of her mental health, the pics couldn't be unclear. There would be a date for processing and the content and sequence can date it further. I sure hope the defense deposes her.
Re my bold-- Why do you hope for that?
Personally, I hope the defense puts her on the witness stand!!!
:floorlaugh: :floorlaugh: :rotfl: :rotfl:
Dam---I'd like to see my rap sheet. Wow---I had 30 cops in my yard. Two cop cars got stuck at the end of my drive and had to get pulled out. Took 3 cops to get me in the cop car---after I drove off my property. Spent the night in jail fore they hauled me to the State nut house. Stayed there a mo for they sent me to a private one for another mo. Had no drugs but had downed a fifth of Southern Comfort. My memory of all that was fun-fun-fun. Not that I would like to go thru it again---I just have fun in most situations.
Dam---I'd like to see my rap sheet. Wow---I had 30 cops in my yard. Two cop cars got stuck at the end of my drive and had to get pulled out. Took 3 cops to get me in the cop car---after I drove off my property. Spent the night in jail fore they hauled me to the State nut house. Stayed there a mo fore they sent me to a private one for another mo. Had no drugs but had downed a fifth of Southern Comfort. My memory of all that was fun-fun-fun. Not that I would like to go thru it again---I just have fun in most situations.
This woman reminds me of another person who Loves to Lounge around this case and keeps Letting us know she is still Looking into it and Last week was ever present once again. I am Leaving out the name.
I thought I'd already explained this at least in part. They obviously left something out of the transcript and she obviously seems to have been on that land 1 or more time before Caylee was found. I would want my attorney to question all of these people that stepped foot on that land before Dec. 11, for the obvious reason of trying to establish when she was or wasn't there. Also, the defense can't know who he wants to call as a witness without asking them questions first. I think that is at least part of the purpose for a deposition.
This was done differently than some other witness interviews.It appears that JW came to the site where Caylee was found ,with her pictures.LE was actively working on recovering all of Caylee's remains and any evidence at the scene.JA ,after talking to JW probably decided to get the bulk of the discussion on tape. Since you see a copy of a past report from JW attached to the picture report ,JA obviously,at some point became aware of JW's history with the case and with LE.I'm guessing that's why he opted to get it on tape right then.She has been unstable in the recent past.
He wasn't exactly set up to do interviews at that time.It could be the tape ran out,the batteries ran down or something was taped over by accident.
Again,JA was in the middle of the most critical part of the Caylee investigation when JW pops up.I think he was smart to get what he could on tape,but I don't fault him for not getting a pristine interview on the side of the road.That's not what he was at the scene for.
LE and the SA are going to be under the microscope by local and national media and the public.I really don't think they would try anything underhanded that could blow this case for them.They don't need to.There's plenty of evidence.
The real story of how long Caylee's body was there will come from the botonists and entomologists reports.
But they may have been better prepared at those interviews . I guess the difference in our take on this interview is that I trust the team from LE working on this case.I am just not suspicious of LE. That's my own personal opinion.They have had a lot to deal with and sort through in this case.The defendent is not cooperating and the defendents family is not cooperating.Oh,make that:The victim's mother is not cooperating and the victim's grandparents are not cooperating. I have not seen anything that gives me reason not to think highly of them[the team from LE investigating].This isn't the only interview they did on location. Two others that come to mind are Kronk and Cain. Compare to theirs and see if you don't see a more complete and tidy job. Others were done out of the office too, TL, for one and a few others come to mind. All of them state the date, time, location, who is present, the body ending with the same info, swearing in, time, etc. Hers is the only one I've seen like this.
Mama Bear you been holding back on us ?Dam---I'd like to see my rap sheet. Wow---I had 30 cops in my yard. Two cop cars got stuck at the end of my drive and had to get pulled out. Took 3 cops to get me in the cop car---after I drove off my property. Spent the night in jail fore they hauled me to the State nut house. Stayed there a mo fore they sent me to a private one for another mo. Had no drugs but had downed a fifth of Southern Comfort. My memory of all that was fun-fun-fun. Not that I would like to go thru it again---I just have fun in most situations.
I thought I'd already explained this at least in part. They obviously left something out of the transcript and she obviously seems to have been on that land 1 or more time before Caylee was found. I would want my attorney to question all of these people that stepped foot on that land before Dec. 11, for the obvious reason of trying to establish when she was or wasn't there. Also, the defense can't know who he wants to call as a witness without asking them questions first. I think that is at least part of the purpose for a deposition.
Mama Bear you been holding back on us ?
All I can say is that this person is very well known...by many...including the media. She and her testimony will not hold much weight, IMO.This isn't the only interview they did on location. Two others that come to mind are Kronk and Cain. Compare to theirs and see if you don't see a more complete and tidy job. Others were done out of the office too, TL, for one and a few others come to mind. All of them state the date, time, location, who is present, the body ending with the same info, swearing in, time, etc. Hers is the only one I've seen like this.
You should have caught her on tape coming to the scene. If you had important evidence, wouldn't you bring it to the Sheriff's office...instead of making a da*n spectacle of yourself at a crime scene? No doubt, there's a very good reason why her interview could be "different" from the others, SHE had NO business being there.This isn't the only interview they did on location. Two others that come to mind are Kronk and Cain. Compare to theirs and see if you don't see a more complete and tidy job. Others were done out of the office too, TL, for one and a few others come to mind. All of them state the date, time, location, who is present, the body ending with the same info, swearing in, time, etc. Hers is the only one I've seen like this.
...He wasn't exactly set up to do interviews at that time.It could be the tape ran out,the batteries ran down or something was taped over by accident....I really don't think they would try anything underhanded that could blow this case for them.They don't need to.There's plenty of evidence...The real story of how long Caylee's body was there will come from the botonists and entomologists reports.
OK---let me know if I'm wrong---sometimes I read stuff into post---but your last several post makes me feel that you would trust JB with your records. Please---I'm not being snarky---I promise---just nosy. Would you hand yours over?
You should have caught her on tape coming to the scene. If you had important evidence, wouldn't you bring it to the Sheriff's office...instead of making a da*n spectacle of yourself at a crime scene? No doubt, there's a very good reason why her interview could be "different" from the others, SHE had NO business being there.