http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/02/22/missing.wife/index.html?iref=mpstoryview
(snips)
State police and grand jury investigations continue into Stacy Peterson's disappearance. Prosecutors have said that both entities are also investigating Savio's death, so if any criminal charges are warranted, they would probably not be filed until the grand jury completes its investigation and hands up an indictment.
***
Savio's family, however, has said they always believed that her death was not an accident. Melissa Doman, Savio's niece, said relatives think Drew Peterson stood to gain about $3 million from Savio's death, based on the couple's shared business interests in a bar and a printing company, their home and payments from five life insurance policies Savio had on herself.
I still wonder about the neighbor...was it Mary? What has she told the GJ? She was Kathleen's friend, not Drews. She won't be his puppet like Steve.
I am certainly hoping that in light of all this...they are keeping a close eye on Drew Peterson. It frightens me to think what a man like DP would do when "cornered" WITH his children. I fear for those children every single day until he is behind bars. He's just arrogant enough to take himself out & the children with him once he realizes he has run out of options.
Unless her exercise regime is throwing herself down a flight of stairs, banging herself on hard, oval shaped objects, or smacking herself with a nightstick...I guess I don't see it!! Was she a hemophiliac? I don't think so or we would have already heard that in one of the many autopsies.http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-drew-peterson-manual-080223,0,2847000.story
Peterson says the truth will set him free. He also says the bruising on Kathleen could've been caused by exercising or by wrestling with the boys.
I thought his whole issue of going to the house was he was trying to return the boys after several days with him- how would she have fresh bruises from the boys if they were with drew? The truth will set him where he belongs!
Peterson's Attorney: First Savio Autopsy Was Right
An autopsy report says Drew Peterson's third wife, Kathleen Savio, was the victim of a homicide, but through his attorney, Peterson insists the first autopsy report that ruled her death an accident is correct.
http://www.wbbm780.com/Peterson-s-Attorney:-First-Savio-Autopsy-Was-Right/1705360
mysteriew,Philamena, IMO it is just that he doesn't think it should be important to them. Why would it be important- they have their father. The woman that gave birth to them has been gone for years, they have adjusted. .....
Excellent point!To have a finding of murder, the state has to prove intent to cause death. DrewP has alleged that when Kathleen Savio died, he was at home, in bed asleep. So according to him, he wasn't present when Kathleen died. When caught, many persons who have killed and eventually confessed will say the death was an accident. (They accidently pulled the trigger, held their head under water, held the pillow over their face, stabbed or struck them. They weren't intending murder, they were just trying to control them, or stop them or scare them.)
Brodsky has now made a statement that the first autopsy was right- saying it was an accident, not the second saying it was murder. If as he has alleged DrewP was home in bed, how would he know if Kathleen's death was an accident or murder? He isn't claiming that someone else entered the home and killed her. He is claiming it was an accident. I think we just may have a partial confession here, lol.
To have a finding of murder, the state has to prove intent to cause death. DrewP has alleged that when Kathleen Savio died, he was at home, in bed asleep. So according to him, he wasn't present when Kathleen died. When caught, many persons who have killed and eventually confessed will say the death was an accident. (They accidently pulled the trigger, held their head under water, held the pillow over their face, stabbed or struck them. They weren't intending murder, they were just trying to control them, or stop them or scare them.)
Brodsky has now made a statement that the first autopsy was right- saying it was an accident, not the second saying it was murder. If as he has alleged DrewP was home in bed, how would he know if Kathleen's death was an accident or murder? He isn't claiming that someone else entered the home and killed her. He is claiming it was an accident. I think we just may have a partial confession here, lol.