Liebchenmutti
Court Junkie
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2013
- Messages
- 2,144
- Reaction score
- 1,187
Listening to her BS was disgusting
She'll be spewing her BS through Kiefer's vector at 6:00PM
He disgusts me almost as much as she does.:stormingmad:
Listening to her BS was disgusting
I "designed" a tee-shirt, am I an artist? LMAO
Despite the disgusting nature of the shirt being a lie and the smack in the face that she survived and her victim didn't - seriously, what was it about the shirt she was so proud of designing? That she spelled the word right? I mean, seriously a 5 year old could do better. This media tour is ridiculous.
KCL - should I be on standby for any pics tonight?
What happened to our court watchers page? Anyone know TIA!
What happened to our court watchers page? Anyone know TIA!
I was looking for that too!It had the list of juror's and their names as we know them on it??
I was looking for that too!It had the list of juror's and their names as we know them on it??
I get many answers. Is there a LWOP penalty in AZ? Or just a Life penalty with possibility of parole in 25 years?
Hi guys,
Finally back after a long long day at the courthouse.
I worked this morning and came out of my last session to find a ton of texts about the "deadlock", rushed down to the courthouse to find my pals in fight or flight...we all ran back upstairs and immediately held a prayer circle, led by Katie Wick in a small hallway. She led a beautiful prayer and we tapped in to the collective good energy and prayers coming from around the world and to be led in the ways to be supportive and helpful to the family in all the best ways.
So we were just mingling, talking to various journalists from Beth Karas to Jeff Gold to WildAboutTrial (who got me in a fit of hysteria over the word "blouse" asking me "What is a blouse? I thought it was a bird").
I was standing over at the wall charging my phone with Katie and we saw this article Kiefer wrote which included apparently a verbatim account of the note the jurors sent out, including the signed "foreperson". I found that odd as no other journalists were reporting on this set of details and usually notes like that are NOT released to the media/public. I'm sure you all know my feelings on Kiefer and of course I lean to thinking someone from the defense wanted that "out there" so they got that info to "their man".
Anyway, suddenly Katie turns to me and says "have you actually read this note?" and goes on to have this lightbulb moment asking if I thought maybe the jurors were just asking a question about the instructions, clarifying how they are to handle things if certain decisions were made/not made. Not necessarily saying they were THERE but how to handle it if they ever GET THERE.
Here is a copy of the note as Kiefer reported it:
The jury sent a handwritten note on an official question form to the judge. It said: If the jury is unable to come to a unanimous decision @ this stage, do we notify the judge of this on the form (verdict) or do we just tell the judge her instruction on the bottom P. 10 on the final jury Instruction-Penalty phase?
It was signed by juror No.18.
So it caught my attention and we sat there kind of chewing on this idea, the timing, etc. What we realized is that with the timing of how things went down today, is that this note/question came in about 40 minutes after they started deliberating today. Kind of a quick timeframe to get "deadlocked". What if they were just asking a question? Not indicating they were not in agreement!
We discussed it with another journalist who kind of poo pooed the idea as, apparently it was just drummed up by lowly "trial watchers" and not REAL JOURNALISTS (I'm not gonna name this person but not one of my faves and in Kiefer's back pocket imo). He actually got a bit aggressive when we were having the audacity to question this. He showed us Judge S's words on his cell phone but we kept saying "but that's not what the jury said!". What they asked was IF they are deadlocked. A whole lot in those two little letters.
IF
So we float this idea to both Beth Karas AND Mike Galanos (super nice guy) and Ted Rowlands who are all ears and saying "you might have a point there!". Imagine that, a journalist who is listening and open to a new idea than the one they've wedded themself to.
Lo and behold, on Dr. Drew, Beth Karas floats this exact theory! We coached Katie all thru the dinner hour to say this on Dr. Drew which she did! Even though Beth had already suggested this idea.
All the hystrionics and drama today abated in one little two letter word.
So we ended up dining with Harold and Tanisha, I talked to Sam on the phone...they are all doing ok, all things considered.
I also passed messages to them from Janine Driver and Wendy Murphy that came my way...and a sweet message about God from our dear Jayarohh.
After we left I think we were all feeling pretty good.
I DO NOT THINK this jury is "deadlocked". I think they will reach a verdict tomorrow and sentence Jodi Arias to death.
I'm told that every juror looked in the direction of the family today when this went down as they left the courtroom. Jodi's family was not even in the courtroom. This is all good. I have never seen them do this even once.
Let's all keep breathing and surrounding this jury/family/ourselves in all the strength we can muster. This is where the rubber meets the road.
I'll say the words that said to my friends the moment I saw them today.
Now we have to dig deep.
Now is one of those life moments when you understand how strong you are.
Sweet dreams all.............:seeya:
NO I'm not saying that. I'm saying, as I posted, that a journalist posted the r question exactly as it was written according to this journalist. Which is usually sealed so someone gave this journalist the copy of this question including identifying the foreperson.
I'm saying that it got interpreted as the jury was deadlocked but how Katie Wick, me, Beth Karas and others are looking at this JURY QUESTION it does not appear they are deadlocked.
That's the best I can explain it and I do remember you, so you're welcome.
If you or anyone think I can keep up with all the info coming in to me from various sources on various topics I say walk one day in my shoes. Just one day, not the entire MONTHS I've been dealing with this trial.
I really don't have to post updates you know? But I do, and I hope people appreciate them as I have done for nearly 5 mths on here.
And now I'm outta here as my primary purpose in this trial is to SUPPORT THE ALEXANDER FAMILY so that's my focus and where it will stay til the end.
NO I'm not saying that. I'm saying, as I posted, that a journalist posted the r question exactly as it was written according to this journalist. Which is usually sealed so someone gave this journalist the copy of this question including identifying the foreperson.
I'm saying that it got interpreted as the jury was deadlocked but how Katie Wick, me, Beth Karas and others are looking at this JURY QUESTION it does not appear they are deadlocked.
That's the best I can explain it and I do remember you, so you're welcome.