This is from the transcript provided by
@Allabouttrial, which has been added to the Media Thread for this case. And it's one part of the hearing that I find very confusing. If Detective Stamper's words here can be taken literally (and they should be, since it's sworn testimony), then we have to believe that after Sheriff Stines shot the judge, he surrendered and was taken into custody, booked into jail, and locked up, and that since all that happened, not one officer or detective or anybody in LE sat down with him and questioned him or took a statement or affidavit from him or held an interview with him or brought him in to the interrogation room or anything!
The defense attorney sounded like he found this perplexing as well. He clarified that this is what Stamper was saying, and also made sure to note that the reason he was not questioned was NOT because he had requested an attorney or asserted his right to keep silent and not answer questions without an attorney present. But for some reason, no one ever went back to wherever they put him and asked him anything or for a written statement or anything else! Isn't that unusual? I thought it was S O P to always question a suspect in custody, but maybe not. Here's the relevant part of the transcript:
DEFENSE - Did you attempt to speak to Sheriff Stines at the Leslie County jail after the incident?
DETECTIVE - No.
DEFENSE - Did anyone from your agency attempt to interview him?
DETECTIVE - Not to my knowledge, no.
DEFENSE - At and that point, have you asserted his right to an attorney or anything?
DETECTIVE - No.
DEFENSE - Nobody went back and tried to talk to him or do an interview?
DETECTIVE - No.
(and then he moves on to a new topic)