m00c0w
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2012
- Messages
- 3,506
- Reaction score
- 7,301
To be fair, all we have are paraphrased quotes claiming that KSP stated something. The context of those quotes aren’t clear. If they had not obtained phone dumps at that point (which I think is accurate - I recall reading that they were still being processed), then KSP can both say they don’t have evidence to support that notion (yet), while there also being evidence to support it that just hasn’t been fully processed and examined. KSP’s statement also seems to contradict some of the court testimony as seen upthread (daughter gave statements about talking to the judge).I do not believe KSP would outright lie about the fact that her number was not stored in the victim's phone. MOO Not there means not there. not under her name or any other.
LE has told us the sheriff reportedly made phone calls (plural) from his own phone at least some of which were to his daughter. LE has said that Stines dialed his daughter's number in and made at least a call to his daughter using Mullins' phone. LE has said that the daughter did not answer the call from Mullins phone, nor was her number stored as a contact in his phone.
What is not clear (yet) is did the sheriff and his daughter have any conversation(s) in the calls he made to her from his own phone? And what was the content of those conversations?
I think a lot of folks are trying to avoid this being tried in the media, so are putting forth a lot of effort to extinguish flames before they erupt into a massive thing.
JMO