Kronk's Ex-Wife Questioned By Prosecutors

[whiskeygurl]

bbm
IMO, this woman is not a key witness and I am willing to bet she will never be a part of Casey's trial.

I listened to her interview on Nancy Grace Friday my opinion she does not act like a woman who has been battered. My personal thoughts is she is lying & appears by her behavior its just a grind to ax with Mr Kronk. She shows no signs of an battered woman. Second why couldn't she travel to Florida to make the deposition with the pros? She did not appear ill in the interview? If the story was true I am sure they would travel any where & every where to tell their story instead she stays in Ten. Where are the police reports to back up her claims of such abuse? It's to easy to lie about with out having proof like those reports

 

[Angel4u2Whisper2]

The more I think about it, this all smoke and mirrors. A temporary distraction to bring what the defence hopes is reasonable doubt. A word for the defence, will it work?
I doubt it.

 

[strawberry]

Ok...still looking for that comment about how "we'll all understand". In my journey I did find a transcript posted on a blog...it was the NG show from 7/23/08. On the show, JB claims that he believes ZFG kidnapped Caylee. So why are we talking about RK when Casey's own attorney said it was the babysitter?

I don't know that there is one quote. That was their mantra from the beginning and stated it over and over. "There is a compelling reason for her behavior." "It will all come out at trial." Even CA's "when all the info is out everyone will call her the MOTY" or whatever it was she said. The other thing Baez and CA kept saying was the public doesn't have all the facts so they can't understand her behavior. Well we have lots of facts now and still don't understand! (Thanks, TWA for all those old clips!)

 

[Woe.be.gone]

This is the first thread I could find with Kronk's name on it and his ex is still in the picture so,

WTH? Did everyone see RK's time sheets and cell ping info? I just saw them yesterday. Have they been discussed at WS?

RK's cell pinged near Hopepring Drive tower on June 18, 2008, at 07:06 and
June 20, 2008, at 14:57-5:15. (pdf. page 52 - link on Gonzalez thread, post 79).

Also he called in to work on June 23 and 24 and was absent those two days.

Is nobody else bothered by these coincidences as to the dates that have been so questionable when sleuthing KC's activities?

Funny that.

 

[Sun]

This is the first thread I could find with Kronk's name on it and his ex is still in the picture so,

WTH? Did everyone see RK's time sheets and cell ping info? I just saw them yesterday. Have they been discussed at WS?

RK's cell pinged near Hopepring Drive tower on June 18, 2008, at 07:06 and
June 20, 2008, at 14:57-5:15. (pdf. page 52 - link on Gonzalez thread, post 79).

Also he called in to work on June 23 and 24 and was absent those two days.

Is nobody else bothered by these coincidences as to the dates that have been so questionable when sleuthing KC's activities?

Funny that.

You should re-read page 49 at link http://www.cfnews13.com/static/articles/images/documents/casey-01-0805-2010_Part2.pdf

LE noted that a call made from Kronk's employer, would ping that tower.

 

[Woe.be.gone]

You should re-read page 49 at link http://www.cfnews13.com/static/articles/images/documents/casey-01-0805-2010_Part2.pdf

LE noted that a call made from Kronk's employer, would ping that tower.

Yes I know. I did read that but the operative word is 'could'. He was at work many other days where his cell phone did not ping the Hopespring tower. You'd think LE would publish all of the instances that Kronk's cell pinged that tower. Why would he ping there only on those days? Like winning the lotto I guess, just lucky. That and the two days he took off are two key days we've gone over and over KC's activities. I just find it odd is all so thought I'd mention it as I can't find any prior discussion on the topic.

adding from the transcript ~ "Note that the cell tower is approximately 1 mile due east of where Roy Kronk worked in 2008. 4937 Hopespring Drive is approximately 2.3 miles southeast of this same tower therefore a phone call placed from Roy Kronk's workplace could hit the same cell phone tower as a call placed from 4937 Hopespring Drive." bbm

 

[LambChop]

Yes I know. I did read that but the operative word is 'could'. He was at work many other days where his cell phone did not ping the Hopespring tower. You'd think LE would publish all of the instances that Kronk's cell pinged that tower. Why would he ping there only on those days? Like winning the lotto I guess, just lucky. That and the two days he took off are two key days we've gone over and over KC's activities. I just find it odd is all so thought I'd mention it as I can't find any prior discussion on the topic.

I believe LE accounted for those days RK was not working and he was not in the area. Since he is not a suspect his life is still not a public matter. He has been cleared by LE, there is absolutely no connection between he and KC and if there were JB would be shouting it to the rooftops. He is just another victum of the woman who can't tell the truth if her life depended on it and is proving that to us everyday..... jmo

 

[Woe.be.gone]

I believe LE accounted for those days RK was not working and he was not in the area. Since he is not a suspect his life is still not a public matter. He has been cleared by LE, there is absolutely no connection between he and KC and if there were JB would be shouting it to the rooftops. He is just another victum of the woman who can't tell the truth if her life depended on it and is proving that to us everyday..... jmo

The other day we were discussing when the death penalty was put back on the table; it was April 13, 2009. Kronk was interviewed 1/6/09, then JH and DC on 3/25/09. I'm just curious as to how these guys tie together. I'm thinking there's more to the story.

 

[LambChop]

Not sure what you are getting at regarding there being more to the story. In regards to what specifically. I do not see any connection between any of these men other than JH has had his PI for awhile and has done prior investigations according to his depo. DC has had no real experience only just having gotten his license and RK worked for the city. What connection do you see? jmo

 

[Woe.be.gone]

Not sure what you are getting at regarding there being more to the story. In regards to what specifically. I do not see any connection between any of these men other than JH has had his PI for awhile and has done prior investigations according to his depo. DC has had no real experience only just having gotten his license and RK worked for the city. What connection do you see? jmo

I have no idea. Things don't sit right with me as to RK's story.

 

[LambChop]

Okay. I thought you might have some new information.

 

[whiteangora]

Not sure what you are getting at regarding there being more to the story. In regards to what specifically. I do not see any connection between any of these men other than JH has had his PI for awhile and has done prior investigations according to his depo. DC has had no real experience only just having gotten his license and RK worked for the city. What connection do you see? jmo

I think if there was any connection between Kronk, DC and JH we would have heard about it by now.

 

[Woe.be.gone]

I think if there was any connection between Kronk, DC and JH we would have heard about it by now.

Even if they're the ones who hold the keys as to why the DP was placed back on the table?

In alot of the interviews I see ... blah blah blah ... ...blah .....
Those dots mean they leave words/sentences out. Why is that? Who gets to know everything said and how what is said connects to everything else?

For instance, in AD's interview there are alot of dots. :waitasec:

 

[LambChop]

I think if there was any connection between Kronk, DC and JH we would have heard about it by now.

Exactly. All we hear from defense how upset they are with the way SA is finding out all this EXTRA information, such as 60 new witnesses.....I mean this trial should have gone forward by now....give a guy a break already... Sorry, my bad, I forgot it was Mr. BIG (JB to the rest of us) who asked to have the date extended because they would not be ready in time. And now he is complaining that he will not be ready in time......a year later....because what he should have done last year, could have done last year.....he did not do. Because he was too busy trying to find a way to get rid of the judge, to hang the crime on the person who found the body and to implicate 4,000 searchers who out of the goodness in their hearts searched for this poor child while "Mommy Dearest" was passing clues to anyone who would listen, family, jailhouse friends, attorneys, etc. jmo

 

[MissJames]

The other day we were discussing when the death penalty was put back on the table; it was April 13, 2009. Kronk was interviewed 1/6/09, then JH and DC on 3/25/09. I'm just curious as to how these guys tie together. I'm thinking there's more to the story.

They tie in because they became involved in the case AFTER it became public.
That's it.
KC's stories,along with Cindy's and George's are the ones that don't ring true.
Kronk may not be a saint,but nothing in his past ties him to KC,Caylee,pedophelia, or murder.
It's easy for the defense to throw out distractions and they will,but if you look back at KC ,at her statements and her actions,you will see Kronk doesn't factor in .JMO

 

[LambChop]

Even if they're the ones who hold the keys as to why the DP was placed back on the table?

In alot of the interviews I see ... blah blah blah ... ...blah .....
Those dots mean they leave words/sentences out. Why is that? Who gets to know everything said and how what is said connects to everything else?

For instance in AD's interview, there are alot of dots. :waitasec:

If I am not mistaken I believe the DP was put back on the table because of the duct tape wrapped around Caylee's face, items from the home found with the body, the fact the car "smelled like a dead body" and the very fact that they found a body... But that is just an educated guess.

 

[LambChop]

Plus defense is trying to build reasonable doubt with whoever happens to be in the path. Be glad you don't live down the street from these people......

 

[cloud9]

Well... I may as well post this. Way back, I was searching around. I came across a site that was not a news site. I can't remember if it was a blog or what. Anyway, what I read there was that KC, Kronk and some woman were seen together in some park somewhere. Supposedly it was around the time Caylee was gone, but I think just a bit before so. I have never been able to find that site since! I find that strange.

Though, I will say that I do not believe Kronk harmed Caylee. I believe her mother did that! *IF* Kronk was involved in any way, the only way I can think of is *IF* he helped KC. Now if he knew KC and was seen with her, that's possible.

JMO

 

[MissJames]

Plus defense is trying to build reasonable doubt with whoever happens to be in the path. Be glad you don't live down the street from these people......

Look at the way they are after info on the volunteer searchers with TES. The fact that they are still looking for more people to throw under the bus means they don't have a true suspect,besides KC . If Kronk could truly be tied to the death ,the defense would stop with him.

Also,so many things were happening in the investigation,during the time the SA decided to make this a DP case that the interviews Woe mentioned may not even have been a factor at all! These cases don't happen one small point at a time. Many people are involved at any given moment. Lab tests, the medical examiner,FBI,LE, SA's ,etc.......
I just don't think you can pinpoint this back to those interviews. Again,JMO

 

[MissJames]

Well... I may as well post this. Way back, I was searching around. I came across a site that was not a news site. I can't remember if it was a blog or what. Anyway, what I read there was that KC, Kronk and some woman were seen together in some park somewhere. Supposedly it was around the time Caylee was gone, but I think just a bit before so. I have never been able to find that site since! I find that strange.

Though, I will say that I do not believe Kronk harmed Caylee. I believe her mother did that! *IF* Kronk was involved in any way, the only way I can think of is *IF* he helped KC. Now if he knew KC and was seen with her, that's possible.



JMO

LE poured over KC's phone records,computers,texts ,her friends and family's phones and computers.
KC was a prolific texter.If there was a connection to Kronk they would know it.
So we have Kronk,Jesse Grund,Amy ,Ricardo,George and Lee with tire tread imprints.Very soon I expect Cindy to be squished,as she would be the easiest to implicate,IMO. And ,God knows,what JB and CM will do with the TES records.

Questions like these are exactly what the defense wants,to distract and deflect from the obvious.Don't fall for it. Go back to the beginning. Reread KC's statements.
Play the jail phone tapes.
Listen to George implicate his own daughter. Watch closely as he vomits,just recalling the smell of his grandbaby's decomposing body in KC's car.
Look at the Henkel logo on the tape wrapped around Caylee's face.
Recall all the items from home found with Caylee's body and the way Cindy tried to trick LE with toothbrushes and hairbrushes.
Then look at Kronk. What can you find,really?