beerslinger
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2009
- Messages
- 46
- Reaction score
- 0
K.S.A. 21-3302(a) provides that "[a] conspiracy is an agreement with another person to commit a crime or to assist in committing a crime." Furthermore, K.S.A. 21-3302(a) proclaims that "[n]o person may be convicted of a conspiracy unless an overt act in furtherance of such conspiracy is alleged and proved to have been committed by such person or by a co-conspirator."
BBM ^
I found the above after a few minutes searching. The way it reads to me, only one party has to commit the overt act for all parties to be guilty of conspiracy. Anyone else have an opinion on how it reads to them?
that makes much more sense. otherwise you could talk to people about killing someone all day long and if someone acted on it, you'd get off scott free.
thanks for clarifying