KY - Breonna Taylor, 26, unarmed, fatally shot multiple times by police, Louisville, 13 Mar 2020

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Fact check: Posts with Breonna Taylor 'truths' include misinformation

Glover said he only had clothes and shoes sent to Taylor's apartment because he was afraid they would be stolen if they were left at his home.

Louisville's U.S. postal inspector, Tony Gooden, told WDRB News in May that a different agency (which he did not identify) had asked in January to look into whether Taylor's home was receiving suspicious mail. The office had concluded that it wasn't, Gooden said.
He only had his clothes and shoes sent to BT's home because he feared theft. That sounds reasonable.

There's no way he would send any of his drugs there. JMO
 
Drug dealers trust using the US Postal Service to ship narcotics — even to IU

Among the main mail carriers — the U.S. Postal Service, FedEx and UPS – the shipping service trusted most by many drug dealers is the government’s very own.

Private companies such as UPS and FedEx are required by federal law to collect and log package information such as mailing addresses, weight and package contents. This makes it easier for government agencies to investigate and observe suspicious shipment patterns if needed.

But the federal government does not impose those same strict rules on the Postal Service, whose packages often enter and exit shipment facilities without a clearly documented path.

Dealers capitalize on these loopholes, transforming federally paid Postal Service employees into unsuspecting middlemen in the illegal drug trade.

Drug dealers trust using the US Postal Service to ship narcotics — even to IU
 
Drug Dealers Consistently Use the US Postal Service to Ship Drugs

A recent report published by the Postal Service Office of Inspector General alerted people to a long-running problem facing the government agency – drug dealers consistently use it to ship drugs to their customers.

“For example, a cocaine trafficker claimed to have used the Postal Service to successfully distribute nearly 4,000 shipments, stating that they had a 100 percent delivery success rate,” the report stated (PDF). “In addition, of the 96 traffickers who indicated they used the Postal Service as their shipping provider, 43 percent (41) offered free, partial, or full reshipment if the package did not arrive to the buyer’s address because it was confiscated, stolen, or lost.”
Staffers in the Inspector General’s office discovered that 92 percent of illicit drug sites that identified a method of shipping use the US Postal Service, and 80 percent of websites indexed by search engines – on the “clear web” – instructed people to use the US Postal Service when shipping drugs.

Drug Dealers Consistently Use the US Postal Service to Ship Drugs
 
OK so why does JG himself say he receives packages there? After all, it is his registered address, based on his car and bank statements. And LE know this is common practice. If they left out his registered address from the search warrants, that would be negligent and ruin the whole operation as they had witnessed him picking up packages in January.
You can have more than 1 address but in KY the address on you drivers license is considered your "legal" address.
 
OK so why does JG himself say he receives packages there? .

The warrant says suspected USPS package.

Not all packages are delivered by USPS which might be why “ Sgt. Mattingly stated he told Det. Jaynes there was no package history at that address”.

It could have been a ups/amazon/lasership package and usps would have no way to verify that.
 
Last edited:
The warrant says suspected USPS package.

Not all packages are delivered by USPS which might be why “ Sgt. Mattingly stated he told Det. Jaynes there was no package history at that address”.

It could have been a ups/amazon/lasership package and usps would have no way to verify that.

Internal investigation: Louisville police told no 'suspicious' packages sent to Breonna Taylor's home

On March 12, a day before the raid on Taylor's Springfield Drive unit, a warrant affidavit written by Detective Joshua Jaynes said he had “verified through a US Postal Inspector that Jamarcus Glover has been receiving packages” at Taylor’s home.

Police cited that claim as a justification for seeking out a warrant that allowed officers to enter her home as part of a broader narcotics investigation into Glover and an associate.

But an investigative report from LMPD's Public Integrity Unit, obtained by WDRB News, says officers asked two members of the Shively Police Department to check with a postal inspector and were told there were no packages being sent to Taylor’s home.

In a May 18 interview with the department’s Public Integrity Unit, Shively police Sgt. Timothy Salyer said that sometime after Taylor's shooting -- and after he read the warrant affidavit -- he asked Sgt. Jonathan Mattingly, an officer involved in the raid, about the affidavit.

“Sgt. Mattingly stated he told Detective Jaynes there was no package history at that address,” Salyer told investigators, according to a summary of the interview.

The police summary says Mattingly initially reached out to Salyer and Detective Mike Kuzma of the Shively department in mid-January, at Jaynes’ request, to find out about packages going to Taylor’s apartment, Salyer said, because he had a good relationship with a Louisville postal inspector.

Salyer also said the “postal service does not want to work with LMPD any longer” after an incident involving officers and postal workers a few years ago. The police summary does not elaborate.

Mattingly asked Salyer and Kuzma to investigate on Jan. 17, a day after police say Glover received a package at Taylor's home. Glover told The Courier Journal in August that he received shoes and clothing at the Springfield Drive home.

After he was first contacted by Mattingly, Salyer told him that “no packages had been received at the address and the post office did not receive any packages either,” he told Sgt. Jason Vance and Sgt. Jeremy Ruoff, who conducted the interview. The date of that conversation is not included in the police summary.

A week later, Salyer told investigators, he was contacted by two other LMPD officers, Detective Mike Nobles and Detective Kelly Hanna, about any packages going to Taylor’s home and said he “told them the same information,” according to the summary.

On April 10, about a month after Taylor was fatally shot by police, Salyer said he received a text from Jaynes, again asking about any packages going to Taylor’s home.

“(Salyer) told Detective Jaynes there were no packages in months delivered to the address and the location was flagged if any were detected and the Postal Inspector would be notified,” according to the summary.

Jaynes also asked if Glover was receiving any “mail matter" and Salyer said he would check.


“Sgt. Sayler (sic) was confused as to why Detective Jaynes contacted him almost a month after the shooting incident inquiring about packages being delivered to the address,” according to the summary.

Nobles said he was confused about the "conflicting information on the affidavit as well," the summary says.

In June, Jaynes was reassigned amid questions about how and why the warrant was approved.

At the time, Tony Gooden said a different law enforcement agency asked his office in January to investigate whether Taylor's home was receiving any potentially suspicious mail. After looking into the request, he said, the local office concluded that it wasn't.

"There's no packages of interest going there," Gooden told WDRB in May.

Police claimed Glover was using Taylor's address as his home address and was seen picking up a package from her apartment on January 16 before driving to a "known drug house," according to an affidavit for the warrant approved on March 12.

"Affiant verified through a US Postal Inspector that Jamarcus Glover has been receiving packages" at Taylor's home, police wrote in the search warrant.

Asked about this during the LMPD interview on May 18, Salyer said packages could have been delivered and received under another name to the address.
 
Last edited:
The warrant says suspected USPS package.

Not all packages are delivered by USPS which might be why “ Sgt. Mattingly stated he told Det. Jaynes there was no package history at that address”.

It could have been a ups/amazon/lasership package and usps would have no way to verify that.
I agree. It sounds like they were only talking about USPS packages with the postal inspector. There could have been DHL or other courier packages being delivered. It was a suspected USPS package but may have been a courier package that they saw being retrieved in January.

Internal Probe Casts Doubt Over Police Claim Of Suspicious Mail At Breonna Taylor's Home

I also wonder what name they checked for?
 
The warrant says suspected USPS package.

Not all packages are delivered by USPS which might be why “ Sgt. Mattingly stated he told Det. Jaynes there was no package history at that address”.

It could have been a ups/amazon/lasership package and usps would have no way to verify that.
USPS would be able to verify some Amazon packages, they deliver about 30% of their packages
 
@TravisRagsdale
When asked if she would issue a show-cause or contempt order for Jaynes, Judge Mary Shaw said she was "concerned but deferring to the FBI investigation." Shaw signed the warrant.
@WDRBNews
 
Right to help him retire my arse, this is to help his defense in case the Feds indict him it has nothing to do with his retirement or moving IMO retired LE get a very good pension one they retire.
Why should they indict him? The GJ cleared them so what charges do you think the Feds can bring? It explains it is to buy out his remaining years.
 
I just realised that "suspected USPS package" could mean they believed it was a USPS package but were not sure. Up till now I was wrongly interpreting it to mean a suspect package, which has a different meaning altogether.
 
Why should they indict him? The GJ cleared them so what charges do you think the Feds can bring? It explains it is to buy out his remaining years.

The Grand Jury didn’t clear him. They weren’t given the option of charging Cosgrove or Mattingly.
 
The Grand Jury didn’t clear him. They weren’t given the option of charging Cosgrove or Mattingly.

My understanding is that the GJ were taken through all the options and they decided that it was self defence. That was how it was explained by the AG. Or I have possibly misunderstood the explanation.
 
My understanding is that the GJ were taken through all the options and they decided that it was self defence. That was how it was explained by the AG. Or I have possibly misunderstood the explanation.

He implied that he did. That is why the juror filed a motion to release the court transcripts.

@TessaDuvall
·
Cameron's spokeswoman acknowledged Monday night that the only recommendation prosecutors made to the grand jury was for wanton endangerment charges against Hankison — seemingly contradicting an earlier statement made to reporters.

Grand jury not presented with murder charges against 2 officers in Breonna Taylor's death, AG Cameron says

http://juryverdicts.net/Grandjuror.pdf
 
Last edited:
The Grand Jury didn’t clear him. They weren’t given the option of charging Cosgrove or Mattingly.
So you believe the officers should have been charged with what? Murder? Some type of manslaughter?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
195
Guests online
2,726
Total visitors
2,921

Forum statistics

Threads
599,887
Messages
18,100,911
Members
230,947
Latest member
tammiwinks
Back
Top