TrialAddict
Member
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2009
- Messages
- 513
- Reaction score
- 1
deleted my post
She may have given the teacher the paper work to give to someone else.
She may have given the teacher the paper work to give to someone else.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The reason I don't think the appt is important is that even if she didn't think he had an appt the school policy was not to call the parents. In the grand scheme of things it would have made no difference because no call would have been made. She may well have been worried that she didn't see him after the morning science fair but since they never called I doubt she would have done so then.
The reason I don't think the appt is important is that even if she didn't think he had an appt the school policy was not to call the parents. In the grand scheme of things it would have made no difference because no call would have been made. She may well have been worried that she didn't see him after the morning science fair but since they never called I doubt she would have done so then.
I wonder if there were two times this 'appointment info' was given to the teacher? This extra detail of there being 'paperwork' involved and given to the teacher the day before Kyron went missing was given more recently by TH's friend. Previous to this, all we heard about was a rumor that TM shouted to the teacher about an appointment on Friday (that same day?) and the teacher assumed that Kyron was at that appointment. This comment was posted somewhere and was written by someone on behalf of TH or was a friend of TH (I don't have a link but it was posted about like crazy on here!)
Are we to think that there were two separate events to communicate this appointment to the teacher?
[/QUOTE]
Above BBM. It seems as tho SM, TMH is indicating or implying that it was possibly one event(thru her comments that she gave permission to Finster to say to the media) As in Finster says that ~snip~Horman had told Kyron's teacher the day before that she was taking the boy to the doctor on Friday, June 11, and gave the teacher paperwork to fill out related to the appointment~end snip... TMH then turns around and makes an excuse for why teacher THOUGHT Kyron was at dr appt with SM on June 4th. ~snip~
Finster said that when Kyron didn't show up at the bus the afternoon of June 4, Horman talked to the teacher who said she thought that Horman had taken Kyron to the doctor that day. Horman told Finster that the child's teacher was new, in her first year of teaching, and was hard of hearing in one ear. "She doesn't know if she understood her," Finster said. ~end snip
So her excuse covers the part of why, if true that teacher did not understand, that it was due To teacher hard of hearing and new to teaching(which has since been proven a lie), BUT TMH's excuse does not cover for why the teacher would STILL misunderstand when there was actually written paperwork involved(& per TMH this paperwork given to teacher for her to fill out and complete and then RETURN to SM BEFORE said dr.appt).. What also is left out is if and when the paperwork was completed by the teacher and returned to SM. THIS PIECE OF INFO IS NEVER MENTIONED, WHY? IT IS VERY IMPORTANT AND IMO IS KEY. If said paperwork was infact completed by teacher and returned to SM, IMO it would coroborrate that teacher was indeed under the impression that Kyron was at dr.appt and therefore felt justified in her marking him absent. But if said paperwork had not yet been completed and therefore NOT YET RETURNED TO SM, then this coroborrates TMH statement that she said appt was until the following week and also would in turn NOT ADD UP with teachers assumption of Kyron being at dr appt that day June 4th, becasuse if the teacher had not yet completed and NOT YET RETURNED paperwork that was "DUE" BEFORE the appt it would imply that teacher infact did not think appt was until a later date(thus giving her time to complete and return it). This would dfinately play beneficial to SM and likewise look more truthful on her part(that shew did tell teacher the appt was for following week, June 11th)... All of this is why I believe that the info of knowing IF THIS PAPERWORK WAS RETURNED or WAS NOT returned to SM is a VERY BIG KEY of who is being honest here... I hope I am relaying this in somewhat of an understandable way, if I AM NOT MAKING CLEAR MY POINT AND EXPLAINATION OF IMPORTANCE plz let me know and I will try to simplify my explaination..
The reason I don't think the appt is important is that even if she didn't think he had an appt the school policy was not to call the parents. In the grand scheme of things it would have made no difference because no call would have been made. She may well have been worried that she didn't see him after the morning science fair but since they never called I doubt she would have done so then.
Actually, what is strange is why the teacher would say that Kyron was in the bathroom or getting a drink when it was pointed out to her that he was missing if she supposedly thought he was at an appointment at that time. She would have said then- no worry, he's at an appt.
If she did not think he was at an appointment at that time, then how would she explain how Kyron never came back to the room, he did not return to the room, and nobody came to the classroom for him? Doesn't seem likely the SM would be expected to pick Kyron up as he's roaming the halls- if the teacher REALLY thought Kyron had an appt., how does she explain how nobody came to pick him up.
The only thing I can imagine is: when Kyron was noticed missing at first (around 8:45 - 9:00) maybe the teacher truly believed Kyron was getting a drink of water or in the bathroom.
Then, when he didn't come back, maybe she remembered that he had an appointment, and checked her paperwork that TH had given her about the appt, and maybe that paperwork said he had an appt that day, so the teacher assumed TH had taken him to the appt or signed him out.
If this is the case, then I feel the teacher SHOULD have followed up to be certain, but we don't know the relationship the teacher had with TH and we don't know exactly what was said to the teacher about the appt so maybe the teacher trusted that TH had him. Maybe the teacher felt it would be overkill to call TH to verify KH was with her at an appt, if in fact the teacher had paperwork or had been told by TH that KH DID have an appt that day.
If a trusted parent who has volunteered many times in the school tells me that there is an appt, I would believe her.
When the trusted person takes the child, ,I would assume as a teacher that said parent signed the child out as said parent knows the rules and is reliable and responsible.
There would be no need to check up on such a trusted parent. Well, I guess this is a lesson for everyone, isn't it?
As far as the backpack and the jacket, in a low income school, a teacher would be concerned about those items as a child may really really need those items.
With well -to-do parents, the children probably have multiples of those items. Children are forgetful, and to remind the child teaches no responsibility. So the teacher would be no more concerned than finding the child's pencil.
They will only learn by experience if they really need an item and they don't have said item.
The only thing I can imagine is: when Kyron was noticed missing at first (around 8:45 - 9:00) maybe the teacher truly believed Kyron was getting a drink of water or in the bathroom.
Then, when he didn't come back, maybe she remembered that he had an appointment
sbm
gmta :snooty: that's what i came up with, too. Except the part about checking the paperwork. Imo, she might have just said to herself *oh, yeah, the appointment.* But I'm still wondering, in that case, about how the teacher felt about not having the paperwork completed in time (jessigirl). Or maybe it was two different appt's and the teacher knew/thought that. Or maybe that's what the alleged appt. discussion was about, in fact -- "like, oh no, THAT appt. (the one w/ the paperwork) is NEXT friday. Today is the appt. for blah, blah"
jm pure speculation...
wouldn't that assume that the missing child had been placed in a group?
That would mean that he had to have left during the group time. Wouldn't the teacher ask the group leader if the missing child had been picked up by the mother then or did the group leader bring the child to the office?
I thought it might be helpful here to sum up a scenario of how the appointment might have come into play in Kyron’s disappearance. This is purely from my imagination, using what we know from Jaymie Finster’s comments in: Friend: Terri Moulton Horman to take another polygraph in Kyron Horman's disappearance
Terri Horman could have premeditated, calculated and carefully executed Kyron’s disappearance. She would have chosen the day of the science fair because she knew it would afford her the opportunity to have extra time and a good cover story, taking advantage of the off-balance chaos of a non-standard day. She possibly used Kyron’s vision or obedience issues to generate a need for an appointment with a specialist of some kind. She scheduled an appointment with that doctor for Friday, June 11, then she acquired the inventory from the doc’s office for the teacher to complete. A lot of offices have those forms available on their web pages to download.
Kyron usually rides the bus, but for some reason, Terri is there on Thursday the 3rd, perhaps she is there doing her volunteer work as a reading teacher. She gives the forms from the doctor to Kristina Porter in the noisy gym, anticipating that it will support her position later when she needs to say, “Mrs. Porter misheard me” and help cover her lie. She says something like, " Kyron has an appointment Friday, could you please fill this out, so we can get it back in time for his appointment? I'll be coming with him to school tomorrow morning for the science fair anyway. Could you please get it completed for me so I can get it from you then? Thanks a million."
The next morning, (Friday, June 4, day of science fair) she asks for and collects the completed paperwork from the teacher, and says something ambiguous about the appointment, perhaps, “I really appreciate you getting this done on such short notice. I'm really hopeful that this will help Kyron with yada-x-blah-x-yada I'm so glad they could get us in.” (notice how this still sounds like the appointment is that day, even though she doesn't SAY that. Alternately, she could have actually told the teacher the appointment was for that day, planning all along to deny it later, and knowing she had it scheduled for the 11th, in order to support her version of events.)
They leave Kyron’s jacket and back pack in the classroom, and Terri snaps Kyron’s picture in front of his project, Kyron and Terri tour the other classrooms together. While they are walking around the halls, they are seen by many witnesses, students, parents, faculty, and staff. As time moves closer to 8:45 when the bell will ring, parents are leaving so the school day can begin, TH lingers with Kyron in the halls at the science fair. The children have all reported to their classes, and the parents are trickling out to their cars, and the halls are mostly empty, because most of the kids have gone on to their classes.
Then, with just minutes to go before the bell rings, Terri tells Kyron, ‘Hey, Buddy, I heard about a really special project that uses electricity and includes moving parts. Let’s go check it out!” She starts leading him in the direction of the door nearest her truck, passing the door to his classroom where they see TP, to whom Kyron says ‘Hi! I’m going to see this cool one. It’s electric.’ (please note that in the article Classmate:’I hope My Best Friend Comes Back’ it is not clear if TP saw Kyron alone or with TH, it actually doesn’t say. So I’m going with the notion that she was still with him when Kyron stopped to talk to TP.)
TP knows he needs to get to class, so he goes on inside. Terri & Kyron proceed. Once she has him alone in the hallway, she gives him a plausible reason why they have to go back out to the truck, “Oh shoot! Kyron! we left your lunch in the truck, let’s run get it!” They go out to the truck, unseen, and she then takes actions that result in his disappearance.
Later, when questioned, and the subject of the appointment comes up she can claim that the teacher misunderstood her about the date of the appointment. Even though she purposely mislead the teacher. At that point it would be an issue of one woman’s word verses another. My opinion is that this was not a spur-of-the-moment-crime-of-passion, but rather, she carefully orchestrated her plan well in advance, chose times that would maximize chaos and foster confusion.
I’m still trying to work out how TP’s other information fits in with this. He is quoted in Search for missing Kyron Horman is now a criminal case This is where he talks about the ‘substitute’ who I believe is really a parent volunteer. What’s not clear to me is if Kyron was ever part of one of these tour groups. Clearly, this is the portion of the morning where LE really buttons their lips. We the public don’t know, but I’m betting LE has LOTs of information. I bet they have a map of the parking lot and they know roughly where everyone was parked, what time people came and went, which doors they used. Etc. Etc. I don’t doubt for a minute that they know plenty plenty plenty that isn’t being released right now. That’s why it sort of amused me when someone suggested that LE may not have noticed the “mystery man” in that photo of Kyron by his tree frog project. I was thinking, “are you kidding me!? OF course they noticed it. They’ve gone over everything with a fine toothed comb.” I was embarrassed :iamashamed0005: that anyone would even suggest that the man in that photo hadn't been seen yet. It reminded me of the rocks in Aruba that those people thought must be Natalee Holloway's skeleton. :no:
One thing that IS significant to me about the mystery man is that LE was very quick to say that they know who he is. They’ve interviewed him and that he is NOT a person of interest. They sure haven’t jumped up to defend anyone ELSE the public has openly suspected in this case! :waitasec: Hmmmm…
All from my own imagination, using information we've collected :frog: :frog: :frog: :frog: :frog: :frog:
I really, really, like this! I totaly agree with everything you said. Have you seen the photos I took at Skyline? It shows how easily a little one could slip out the side door and down to the road without being seen.
not necessarily, imo, but it is giving me trouble. we have so little information about when and under what circumstances Kyron was actually last seen. Was he on the way to class and in sm's sight....was he by himself or in a group walking in the hall to go see an electric project.
Is the group leader (assuming this is a parent/helper) certain that Kyron was in her group in the beginning, or was she just noting the lack of proper number of children in her group at the end and Kyron was the only kid in the class not accounted for?
If he was in her group, did she lose track of him going from room to room and not notice till the end. And who might have intervened in those moments?
I would LOVE to know whether that parent knew for a fact she had Kyron in her group at the beginning but not at the end. I guess we will know eventuallyIf she did know for certain that Kyron was in her group at the beginning but not at the end, I do agree that changes things entirely.
jmo
not necessarily, imo, but it is giving me trouble. we have so little information about when and under what circumstances Kyron was actually last seen. Was he on the way to class and in sm's sight....was he by himself or in a group walking in the hall to go see an electric project.
Is the group leader (assuming this is a parent/helper) certain that Kyron was in her group in the beginning, or was she just noting the lack of proper number of children in her group at the end and Kyron was the only kid in the class not accounted for?
If he was in her group, did she lose track of him going from room to room and not notice till the end. And who might have intervened in those moments?
I would LOVE to know whether that parent knew for a fact she had Kyron in her group at the beginning but not at the end. I guess we will know eventuallyIf she did know for certain that Kyron was in her group at the beginning but not at the end, I do agree that changes things entirely.
jmo