SmoothOperator
Sadly what connects all these puzzles is that ther
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2010
- Messages
- 5,591
- Reaction score
- 76
Exactly! They were broke, which makes the story about the two offering hundreds of dollars to dancers for a "little treat" so suspicious. I don't want to call anyone a liar, but I'd like to know what MAS really told the dancer she approached on stage. If it's true MAS offered her money, whose money was it? I don't blame her for not mentioning any other names to a reporter. I only pray she's been upfront with LE. So when she turned them down, they asked Jaren, and possibly one other dancer before her who also refused. I'm pretty sure JL would have known those two didn't have $500 or $700 to throw around. So why did she leave with them, and even ask to get off early to do so? Who did she think would be paying for her time? Who??
Which it is exactly this that is the issue IMO that is most indicative of absolute premeditation ..if you are the person propositioning individuals for an activity which will yield payment.. yet you full well know that you do not have the money to pay that which you are promising. Well.. IMO that is much more likely to be that there was never any intention to pay what you are promising and that there is a totally different ulterior motive for why they are propositioning the girls.. as in they will change up the offer as much as necessary to get one of the girls to agree.. with MAS/TS full well knowing they will not ever follow through with any of what is promised...certainly not paying monetarily.. therefore if they knew they didn't have the money to pay, yet these girls absolutely know these two and would absolutely make known that these two had screwed them over...
These two had no worries of that IMO due to the fact that they knew the victim would never live to tell.. again IMO indicating a high level of premeditation...
Some may say that if premeditated these two would have done a better job of covering their tracks.. especially not being caught on surveillance as the last to be with the victim.. and my answer to that is that save the issue of Jaren's body parts quickly surfacing there certainly appears to be no other major damning evidence having been found.. namely the site of the murder and dismemberment .. LE says those locations have yet to have been found.. IMO that's due to some level of pre planning.. premeditation ..
If they strongly felt that Jaren's body parts were successfully disposed of and would not surface.. if that had actually happened that way we would not even have a victim.. a homicide case.. we would merely have a missing persons case.. that as most locals know due to the fact that Jaren was a dancer her being merely a missing person would not at all take a high priority and it certainly would not have MAS/TS incarcerated.. because there'd be no Mississippi LE involved(who appear to be who took the case very seriously with her remains on MS beach) ...no FBI involvement..no pressure from any outsideLE agencies..nor media..
Without Jaren's remains having washed ashore MAS/TS are not even suspects.. they are going about their daily lives having completely gotten away with murder.. meanwhile Jaren would just be a Bourbon Street dancer that LE would assume had taken off.. no news media.. no case period..
So you see their premeditation would have worked perfectly.. they would've gotten away with murder.. they had zero idea her remains would wash ashore...especially not within mere hours of their having murdered her.. i truly believe this was premeditated and that there are only two people involved in this murder.. the two that are currently incarcerated..
Think about it.. what I'm saying makes sense.. of course IMO it does..