Lilibet
Southern Oregon
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2013
- Messages
- 19,609
- Reaction score
- 81,865
It's kind of like the Fletchers just threw up their hands and said "oh well, she can just sit on the couch." Unfathomable.
I actually think this may be what gradually happened. They may have hoped she’d get tired of just sitting there on the couch…but she didn’t. And then what? While Google tells me that it’s easier to obtain an involuntary commitment in Louisiana than in many states, the 72 hours would not have been long enough to really help her. They said “she balked” so they didn’t pursue it. And they might have feared that she would get worse or just leave home and be on the streets. And then what?
I’m certainly not making excuses for them, but more like trying to see how this could happen. These parents do not appear to be like the Turpins who had a long history of abusing their children. Mental illness in a young person is a terrible thing for families to deal with. Getting appropriate help is extremely difficult and also requires a willingness to cooperate on the part of the patient. She was in her early 20s when this couch-sitting began…an adult. I’m trying to imagine what their legal, moral and ethical options were. Over time, they may well have felt they were out of options and just gave up. Not an excuse at all, of course! It’s easy to say we’d do such-and-such to end the couch-sitting. But in reality, if your child does not want help, what do you do?
I should add that I see this situation through the lens of good, but helpless parents. Our daughter had a high school classmate voted “most likely to succeed” who developed schizophrenia in his 20’s (now 51). I know his parents. Wonderful people. They tried everything, but their hands were tied and they could not prevent those times he went off his meds and endangered himself. No, he wasn’t living in a hole on their couch, but if he had been I’m not sure the system was equipped to help them. JMO