LafayetteMom
New Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2012
- Messages
- 994
- Reaction score
- 1
agreed. with local lingo off of means on just as much as on means on.
Or "out of" is another example. That company is "out of" New Iberia. Meaning it's IN New Iberia.
agreed. with local lingo off of means on just as much as on means on.
I was thinking the same. People say "Where'd ya get that?" and someone answers "Oh, I ordered it offline instead of online. Or, "She lives off Hwy such and such" meaning she lives ON Hwy such and such. Plus, we have been told she has NOT been seen on any other surveillance past what's been shown, so no other streets "off" of St. Landry. I think he just meant ON St. Landry. Say what you mean, and mean what you say.
I guess I'm in the minority in thinking the perp didn't use University to get to I10. There are two traffic cameras that could easily read license plates that he would have had to pass. He avoided those. If he's from the area he would know they were there. If he wasn't he would have seen them coming (there are signs saying that one is coming up). He would have turned off University and cut over to the thruway and got on there.
I got down at Rouse's off of Bertrand and made my groceries. Then I hurried home and saved the groceries in the pantry.
I got down at Rouse's off of Bertrand and made my groceries. Then I hurried home and saved the groceries in the pantry.
I'm reading like mad trying to get caught up with all these messages so I am sorry if this has already been discussed...ANYWAY...the picture you are talking about bothers me. If you are right, and I do believe you are, she is probably talking to someone in that car parked on the other side of the road. It looks like it's just sitting there with no lights on. I wish I knew how to post the picture here to show you, but I don't have a clue how to do that. I didn't see the car until I adjusted the brightness a bit. If you would, go back to the pic and increase the brightness just a bit and I'm hoping you'll see the car I think I see.
They would have found the bike much sooner (almost immediately) if it was left there.
I know someone mentioned the Krooked Nickel in a previous post, but I'm wondering if this is a viable theory (it fits into the DUI category)
-Closing call is around 2AM, last appearance of Mickey was about 1:48 near Circle K. Bar patron wanted to leave a little earlier than closing time.
-If there were checkpoints on main roads, then I would assume bar patrons would like to avoid them. So they go the back routes, even if there isn't one on Johnston St.
-The back route from the Krooked Nickel would be St. Julien > St. Landry > University > I-10. This puts them on the same route Mickey is on.
-We know the only visible damage seen was to the back tire (according to LE).
Would it be possible that Mickey decided to take a left down St. Mary once reaching the intersection? If a drunk driver ran a red light, and Mickey was partially through the intersection, her back tire would be hit.
Again, these threads move WAY too fast. I can't keep up. I apologize if this was brought up, or if a similar theory was disproved.
Better yet: We went go make groceries!
I guess I'm in the minority in thinking the perp didn't use University to get to I10. There are two traffic cameras that could easily read license plates that he would have had to pass. He avoided those. If he's from the area he would know they were there. If he wasn't he would have seen them coming (there are signs saying that one is coming up). He would have turned off University and cut over to the thruway and got on there.
I got down at Rouse's off of Bertrand and made my groceries. Then I hurried home and saved the groceries in the pantry.
Any information in any interviews from workers/patrons at Artmosphere the night Mickey was there? Is it at all possible she cut through to Johnston st. and and went back to Artmosphere to meet someone? Probably no cameras at Artmosphere?
I like the way you're thinking. But I would think that if someone ran a red light they'd be traveling way too fast to only do relatively minor damage to her bicycle rather than mangle it completely. MOO.I know someone mentioned the Krooked Nickel in a previous post, but I'm wondering if this is a viable theory (it fits into the DUI category)
-Closing call is around 2AM, last appearance of Mickey was about 1:48 near Circle K. Bar patron wanted to leave a little earlier than closing time.
-If there were checkpoints on main roads, then I would assume bar patrons would like to avoid them. So they go the back routes, even if there isn't one on Johnston St.
-The back route from the Krooked Nickel would be St. Julien > St. Landry > University > I-10. This puts them on the same route Mickey is on.
-We know the only visible damage seen was to the back tire (according to LE).
Would it be possible that Mickey decided to take a left down St. Mary once reaching the intersection? If a drunk driver ran a red light, and Mickey was partially through the intersection, her back tire would be hit.
Again, these threads move WAY too fast. I can't keep up. I apologize if this was brought up, or if a similar theory was disproved.
I got down at Rouse's off of Bertrand and made my groceries. Then I hurried home and saved the groceries in the pantry.