The reality of it is that if you had been in the BR area for the two years after Katrina and kept track of the news on TV, you would have found that some individuals from New Orleans were responsible for a great amount of the violent crimes reported on TV. If Lafayette was similar, then you cannot blame residents for feeling Katrina transplants were committing crimes all over the city, many of them violent crimes. My question to you is, is that the fault of the resident or the news organization that reported those crimes to the public? Were those news organizations biased in reporting the Katrina connected crimes or were we truly having more of those crimes being committed?
It was my perception as well that Katrina increased crime in our area, but a year or so ago, I looked up the stats. The total crime didn't increase, though there were minor fluctuations in the types of crimes being committed. The crimes around the BR area have become more widespread. Whether that is the result of Katrina or just natural increases and spreading, I don't know. I suspect it is likely a combination of many factors including widespread drug issues, economic issues, etc. I'm just guessing. This is all JMO, take it for what it is.