So it seems to me that the prosecution has presented at least more than 50% of their case. Can't be exactly sure when, but even before today, they had pretty much covered everything they stated in their opening remarks and backed it up with outstanding experts. So now for Jose, I would have thought that at this point, he would have at least nailed something from his opening remarks. I know he still gets to call witnesses on the defenses behalf but let's see, George, Lee, Cindy, three key players in proving Casey's innocence, according to JB, have already been cross-examined by him. I don't recall during George's cross-examination that I was left with the feeling that George sexually molested Casey, pulled a drowned Caylee from the pool, or disposed of Caylee's body. And i don't recall after Jose's cross-examination of Lee thus far, that I was left with believing that Lee sexually molested Casey. And certainly after Jose cross-examined Cindy, thus far, I have to say I was not left with the sinking feeling that...Uh Oh, Cindy left the ladder attached to the pool. The only person in JB's opening remarks that he blamed for Caylee's demise and disposal that we have not heard from is, Roy Kronk but I really can't believe that the "meter reader did it."
I'm left with the following questions: is it possible that Jose has nothing at all up his sleeve and that he is convinced that just because he said these things in his opening remarks, that everyone will believe him? Does he think because Casey on occasion was a good story teller, that he somehow developed those skills also? Is it possible that he will not bring anyone to the witness stand that will convince me of one thing in his opening remarks?
Great article btw, thanks for posting it - my favorite part: Sometimes — and maybe this is one of those times — you should feel strongly enough to know you’re horribly outclassed..." I for one feel the prosecution deserves an A+ thus far.