LetJusticePrevail
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2008
- Messages
- 813
- Reaction score
- 737
CM didn't serve as lead counsel in the witness testimony on experts retained/% of work they've done thus far, etc.
I do not believe as much work has been done as JB asserts. I think the state would like to depose the experts and uncover the validity of the %'s of work done that JB testified to as well. Can JAC also depose these witnesses?
Wondered then if the fact CM didn't choose to state the case on the experts is because it affords some protection to his being disciplined if it's found JB lied. So net/net, does the fact CM didn't represent still leave the window open for discipline since he's a member of defense team?
I do not believe as much work has been done as JB asserts. I think the state would like to depose the experts and uncover the validity of the %'s of work done that JB testified to as well. Can JAC also depose these witnesses?
Wondered then if the fact CM didn't choose to state the case on the experts is because it affords some protection to his being disciplined if it's found JB lied. So net/net, does the fact CM didn't represent still leave the window open for discipline since he's a member of defense team?