I think the SA should not bring up the Huggins issue again with respect to the particular questions Jose asked Cindy about Casey's statements regarding Caylee's paternity. If Jose does it again, obviously the same analysis would apply--did he elicit important statements that he suggested were true? If so, the SA should be allowed to bring in the felony convictions at that time.
I haven't seen any of the tapes for today yet, but it sounds like he almost did it again, yes!
Snipped by me (hope that's allowed). Here's the link to the comment I was asking about where it sounds like JB almost did it again. It starts a little after the 2 minute mark.
http://www.wftv.com/video/28100954/index.html
The way I understand what you said earlier, the SA wouldn't need to use Huggins if ICA takes the stand because then on cross they can bring in the convictions? If she doesn't testify, then when would they bring up Huggins?
Thank you so much for all you do.