I never did, and still don't like the abduction in the parking lot of the mall because there is maybe only 100 feet of parking lot of the old back entrance to Wards (now Target) to the circular road around the mall, which today has a car on it 90% of the time - cars which I have to avoid almost every time I go to the mall (of course traffic could have been less in the 70s). The circular road around the mall is only about 100 feet wide at most including some grass on the side then it's off the mall property to the swimming pool and house on Faulkner Drive on the Way to Drumm Ave.
It's such a small parking lot on the girl's walk home that in old photos of the plaza, from the main walkway, one can see the tall trees on Faulkner Drive above Montgomery Wards.
Of course criminals often do stupid things, or it might not be forced abduction but a con, such as I am a policeman come with me, but even this has a chance of being noticed in the malls parking lot, maybe less of a chance than physically grabbing girls, but a chance. It's NOT like the girl's path home took them to the back of 50 yard parking lot that was not well traveled.
Instead of walking through Wards, the girls (and I today, well I have to today since there is no back entrance) could walk on the sidewalk around Wards, but this is also well traveled.
Either someone stepping out of Wards, someone walking up Faulkner, someone driving the ring road or someone stepping around the corner could have stumbled on a forced abduction in the act. .........
All excellent descriptions and observations. I have also seen this parking lot on a number of occasions.
While it is true that there are many possible opportunities for a potential abduction to be witnessed, consider that fact that so many abductions have occurred in this very manner in many other cases.
As a choke point for observation or abduction the Wards back parking lot would have been excellent:
- It is a perfect place for a perp to watch for potential victims going into the mall. He could see who is alone or without parents, and the direction they came from.
- While there were two very close possible routes of travel for somone crossing the perimeter road from Faulkner - that is through Wards back entrance, or around the side -, it is most likely that whatever way they went on the way in would likely be the same way they would exit.
- Observing usual traffic patterns at different times of day would give the perp an idea of when there would be the least amount of traffic in the area, and how often police patrolled the area.
- The back parking lot provides a very quick exit from the Mall, of only a few hundred feet to University Blvd, a major road out of the area.
- Some scouting of Kensington residential roads would also allow a perpetrator to have a secondary abduction site chosen and a timing as to when to leave the parking lot in order to control the time of arrival.
- The good view of the perimeter road, the pedestrian approach from Faulkner, and the remoteness of the parking lot (compared to other closer parking spaces in the larger lots) give the perpetrator the option of aborting the mission right up to the point of getting his victims into his vehicle. He could simply try again another day, or could reposition further down the road in Kensington. Leaving by the perimiter road and making a quick left and then another left would put the abductor at the corner of Drumm and McComas in about one minute, whereas it takes someone walking about 8 minutes to make that trip.
Note that all of the above observations would work for ANY potential abductor, regardless of who he or she was. Moving to a position inside the mall might provide the abductor with more information on persons he had previously observed. Seeing them leaving, or having an accomplice follow them and signal him in some way would allow the abduction to occur more smoothly with less chance of detection.