to me, his theories are about as credible as Casey's right now. you could come up with any number of scenarios for what happened, but there has to be tangible evidence to go on. that's why I want to know what other evidence he is going on that makes him "so sure' that Caylee is in the lake at Blanchard Park, other than the beads and the cross. that could so easily be a hoax. and TM did say that they had sonared the lake and no evidence of a human body showed up, which is actual evidence to back up his word. I hate to be a doubter, but I've never put any stock in any of LP's theories, because he can't provide evidence to go on. I really do think he just wants to be 'involved' somehow in the investigation, any way he can. until he starts showing me otherwise, I doubt he has any real "evidence' other than rumor and gossip.