JerricaBenton
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2011
- Messages
- 2,685
- Reaction score
- 5,816
[video=twitter;875017922258771970]https://twitter.com/CCLawNewz/status/875017922258771970[/video]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But even if it is one of Bella's hairs, it doesn't mean PROOF that she was absolutely placed in the fridge, dead. Her hair could have transferred from a sippee cup that was put back in the fridge, or something like that.
If there was more forensics besides that, like MMs fingerprints on the bag or something, it would be more damning.
I was extremely confused by Scott's testimony about semen/sperm and I did not get any clarification on direct or cross exam.
The summary from NBC Boston (http://www.nbcboston.com/news/local...a-Bond-Case-to-Return-to-Stand-428134563.html) said:
She also testified the zebra print blanket Bond was wrapped in tested positive for saliva and semen, and that she tested two stains on the polka dot leggings Bond was found wearing.
"The stain on the knee area was positive for the presence of semen and I took a small portion of the stain on the knee and the stain in the rear crotch area of the pants that was white and extracted those for sperm cells and what were the results of those extractions – those were negative,” Scott said.
----
So what the heck is the difference between testing positive for semen and testing positive for sperm?? Can anyone with a science background help me understand this? TIA!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I was thinking the same. On clothing and the blanket, could have been transferred. Grosssss