"Reasonable" being the keyword... not "imaginable." If you're going to suggest a wild scenario involving dog attacks... a coverup involving dozens... you need to prove that.Not trying to be rude or judgmental here, but having an open mind means that the state has to prove beyond any reasonable doubt. You're looking at it the other way around. IMO
And to that end, there are any number of "no doubt" things that could exist... like prove those marks are from a dog attack. Prove the search was done at 2:27 AM. Cell phone data showing JO active at different times. Show any proof he made it into the house. But... they can't.
It all sounds absurd vs. the obvious drunk/angry gf in her SUV.