A question that is bothering my train of thoughts..
Julie Nagel worth watching again....she slipped and said she went out twice...then did not see the jeep, but saw the SUV move three times....confused about when she saw SUV...well confused me! And does not match at all her brother and friends testimony. Then both her and the other girl claimed they both could see the front door, yet her friend said Julie had her back to the windows...so...I say suspect here.
You mean the guy that didn’t report the car on the road when he called in for hitting a basket ball hoop ?
Honestly, yeah, I think the fact he self reported himself for hitting a basketball hoop provides more credibility to his testimony, that’s embarrassing, if I’m being honest I probably wouldn’t do that, why would you do that unless you’re just being a stand up person
One has to know the backstory and reasoning behind his innocent one time favor. Said never saw an Albert car there like that before. No parking on streets after midnight in winter. He explained it. Figured it must be a good reason, unfortunately it was not. He is not like them is why.
I agree! I also feel like they had placed a lot of faith in the CW and the State troopers because they claimed to be advocates of justice for JOK. Many of the people on the stand were either those he worked with, honored the same uniform as him or were familiar or close to them because of the kids and JOK’s previously deceased sister and BIL. I think they understandably have/had a lot of loyalty and faith in LE and that can be hard to contend with or face when you realize the people who were supposed to be the dedicated and diligent brothers and sisters representing your deceased loved one are too busy either looking for nude photos, mistaking a Heineken for their badge and gun or admiring how the suns rays hit the top of a leaf blower as ruin all the evidence needed by the forensic experts to BA’s personal landscapers.
Because he is, honest testimony despite the rest of them not being. Kind of guy we want around.
He was truthful enough to explain why he did it.
I still haven't figured out why Lucky was out plowing in the middle of the night when it wasn't snowing much. And why did he hit the hoop if conditions where not bad? JMO.
It takes a standup person to recognize one.
IIRC wasn’t there testimony or evidence that the snow plow driver didn’t report the unattended car since it was sitting in front of the Albert’s house? And he did not necessarily want to impugn or jeopardize them? MOO
not sure what the practice is in MA, but sometimes the plow trucks pre-salt to make the removal easier.
Since he grew up with them, I'm certain he knew they were a family of bullies.
It's New England, the plow start to keep the lightly falling snow from freezing on the streets before the snow gets heavier. The DEPTARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS sends them out. They do not do it on their own. They work for the town. Those hoops have wide stands, black. Plenty are placed on the edge of the road in front of the homeowners house, or in the driveways if there is enough room. That is the kind of neighborhood where you can see if a car is coming, a family and quiet type neighborhood it is.
That makes sense.
I've been a dog walker for over 20 years. I may not have gone into every room of every house but I've been in most rooms of every house. She was lying.
Do a poll for snow state people and ask how their mailboxes fare sometimes.
I did not watch a lot of the testimony in this trial- so not sure what the details of the basketball hoop were- some of them fold and it probably was not lighted (though I have seen some with an attached LED!) so I would think it might be hard to see, IMO.
