Its a lonely place on the fence, however, I need to wait for completion of trial. Believe that this really falls under contaminated evidence and therefore she walks. That would be justice -- imo.
However, it's not justice for John O'Keefe because the system failed due to the handling of his case. We will never know the truth.
moo
Ok, then you would not be feeling like I am right now. I feel like I have been lied to!
Like I said earlier, MSMBy whom? I don't know what sources you are using, but the defense never claimed the sneaker wasn't found. Belt and hat.
Like I said earlier, MSM
Like I said earlier, MSM
Just using my own questions ( waiting for Yanetti to jump on this ) but 'what if any' amount of times had a snow plow come down Fairview between 7:50 am and 5 pm that day, and possibly pushed/plowed tailight pieces and a shoe? The scene was a compromised contaminated scene by that point, IMO.
Most of MSN I read on this case is what is posted here at WS. Plenty of WS members have repeated this "sneaker never found" lie as well. We were all duped!Unfortunately its hit or miss with msm.Sometimes they get it right but its best to find something official if possible. I've believed what they wrote only to find out it was the total opposite more than once. They have the worst record when the crime first happens. JMO
Were the taillight lens shards and shoe found at the same distance from the ground? The same elevation relevant to ground level? In the snow? Or at varying and different depths?Lt. O'Hara: "sneaker was completely buried" by snow.
View attachment 507665
ADA Lally showing pictures of wx conditions during SERT team search and taillight evidence that Lt. O'Hara says team recovered
View attachment 507666
View attachment 507667
Yeah, I remember hearing that and I probably posted about it too. I also remember hearing that the sneaker was found a month later.Most of MSN I read on this case is what is posted here at WS. Plenty of WS members have repeated this "sneaker never found" lie as well. We were all duped!
ETA: Do not want to belabor this point, but a simple google search shows the many, many, many repetitions of this lie.
OK I'm done.
yes, unless we could find something from a hearing video or the the like. Since I didn't find anything official, I left that area alone to wait for trial proof. I did see JO was wearing a belt but still don't know if it is missing. Still waiting on the mention on the vomit on his underwear to be explained or not if it exists. JMOMost of MSN I read on this case is what is posted here at WS. Plenty of WS members have repeated this "sneaker never found" lie as well. We were all duped!
ETA: Do not want to belabor this point, but a simple google search shows the many, many, many repetitions of this lie.
OK I'm done.
This woman looks petrified.