MA MA - Sandra Crispo, 54, Hanson, 7 Aug 2019 #3

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
It was about a year and 7 months between Sandra's father's sudden death and hers. Three months in her new and house of her own in Hanson. It was bought with the proceeds from the sale of her father's as her name was the one on the deed of her father's house at the time of his death. He had changed it back to his a couple times it was said/ seen a poster wrote. Deeds show the info. I wonder if the Hanson house was entirely in Sandra's name as it should of been? Info can be found available to the public at Hanson's county office where they keep the deeds. Not sure if someone here has done that or has that info.
Also love to know what made the neighbor woman who was interviewed 'smile and say she was not concerned about any random crime against S or why she was missing. What DID she see? Did she not want to 'get involved' or just didn't care.
 
Did you get the impression that that neighbor woman smiled as , 'oh please, I'm not concerned because Sandra had people coming and going or 'no surprise' there with her observed, short lifestyle?' Was it a woman about her age? All she said? She assumed a LOT that woman I'd say.

It was an early TV clip, very brief and I can only remember her words. Paraphrasing, "we aren't worried". If memory serves, she was a good deal younger than Sandra. I, too, would like to know more about the basis for this, because there has to be some reason. I suppose it simply could be the location of Sandra's house alone. A place you likely wouldn't find unless you were seeking it. But I agree, unless she knew something, it's still a pretty big assumption.
 
It was about a year and 7 months between Sandra's father's sudden death and hers. Three months in her new and house of her own in Hanson. It was bought with the proceeds from the sale of her father's as her name was the one on the deed of her father's house at the time of his death. He had changed it back to his a couple times it was said/ seen a poster wrote. Deeds show the info. I wonder if the Hanson house was entirely in Sandra's name as it should of been? .

The information is available online at the Registry of Deeds for the county. I checked a few months ago and the Hanson house was still in the names of both Sandra and her daughter. I'll also point out that the Quincy house was in the name of both Sandra and her father at the time of his death, not just Sandra's.
 
Not sure why Sandras neighbors wouldn't speak out to what they thought or saw or heard! Its not everyday someone goes missing and the houses being so close along with the streets being narrow you'd think there are people who could help put the pieces together.
Did there ring cameras catch any activity going to or from Sandras house. Was Sandras outside light left on all night?
Someone posted on here a few months ago that we "will be surprised who is involved in this".
I think Justice vs for Sandra is long overdue !
 
The information is available online at the Registry of Deeds for the county. I checked a few months ago and the Hanson house was still in the names of both Sandra and her daughter. I'll also point out that the Quincy house was in the name of both Sandra and her father at the time of his death, not just Sandra's.
I saw here that it had gone back and forth and the last time was just Sandra's name. Sounds incorrect then. Sounds like she was able to just sell that Quincy house and keep the proceeds if one of the owners, her father, had died. Same then with Sandra and her daughter, both names, and one could sell if chooses if Sandra no longer alive, as with Sandra's father. Sandra was fortunate her father chose to put her name on his house as a co owner. She was able to claim as her own and sell it to purchase the Hanson house. An awful shame she was not able to enjoy her very own home long at all.
 
Not sure why Sandras neighbors wouldn't speak out to what they thought or saw or heard! Its not everyday someone goes missing and the houses being so close along with the streets being narrow you'd think there are people who could help put the pieces together.
Did there ring cameras catch any activity going to or from Sandras house. Was Sandras outside light left on all night?
Someone posted on here a few months ago that we "will be surprised who is involved in this".
I think Justice vs for Sandra is long overdue !
Good point about an outside light. Wonder if Sandra usually switched it on once dark. I'd think she would, alone in new and kind of hidden home. Right, just some conversations amongst the neighbors could help with some ideas of why that woman was not concerned it being random, I mean to LE especially. What kind of cars or trucks were seen at her home when observed. Any other than her daughter and SIL'S?
 
Not sure why Sandras neighbors wouldn't speak out to what they thought or saw or heard! Its not everyday someone goes missing and the houses being so close along with the streets being narrow you'd think there are people who could help put the pieces together.
Did there ring cameras catch any activity going to or from Sandras house. Was Sandras outside light left on all night?
Someone posted on here a few months ago that we "will be surprised who is involved in this".
I think Justice vs for Sandra is long overdue !

JMO, just because the neighbors didn't want to say on the news what they thought they might know, does not mean they weren't forthcoming with police.
 
Good point about an outside light. Wonder if Sandra usually switched it on once dark. I'd think she would, alone in new and kind of hidden home.

The real estate listing for the renovated 47 Spoffard Ave. property said the house had "Modern dusk to dawn lights", so they would automatically come on when it got dark and would have gone off at dawn
 
JMO, just because the neighbors didn't want to say on the news what they thought they might know, does not mean they weren't forthcoming with police.
That's what I've hoped too.
 
I saw here that it had gone back and forth and the last time was just Sandra's name. Sounds incorrect then. Sounds like she was able to just sell that Quincy house and keep the proceeds if one of the owners, her father, had died.

Yes. As of 8/15/17, the deed to the Quincy house was in the name of Stephen Dabrowski and Sandra Crispo. They were joint tenants with right of survivorship. There were no changes after this point until after Stephen Dabrowksi's death. Sandra also signed an affidavit on 4/26/19 indicating they were co-owners at the time of his January 2018 death.

In Massachusetts, joint tenants with right of survivorship means "When one joint tenant dies, the surviving joint tenant automatically owns the entire property. This is said to be a 'right of survivorship.' Quoting from a legal site.

So Sandra inherited the house in its entirety. We don't know if her three surviving siblings knew this before their father's death or not. We also don't know what she or they inherited from the rest of his estate, assuming there was more.
 
<modsnip - the part of a post quoted was removed>

<modsnip> My husband and his siblings all know that his unmarried sister who has been living with and helping their mom who has Parkinson's will eventually own the house upon her death. It's all been very transparent, which is really the only way to avoid bitterness.

For anyone interested in looking things up on their own, here is the link to the Norfolk Registry of Deeds (Quincy)

Begin Online Research

And here is Plymouth (Hanson)

Search Records | Plymouth County Registry
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It is unfortunate that going on three years since Sandra disappeared, the family has no closure. Some fairly exhaustive searches have been conducted in the immediate area of Sandra's home and surrounding areas. It seems (at least to me) that wherever she may be located is not near the site of her home. If she did indeed voluntarily leave (or was taken by force) her home and something happened to her after that point, it wouldn't seem logical that she would be found in the vicinity near home. I know that's been considered by LE, investigators, etc. Hypothetically, if she left home on foot and was perhaps hit by car (even by accident), the driver could have panicked and taken her with him/her without calling for help. It has happened in other cases. Obviously, this is all speculation. You would think that if LE were any closer to solving this, they would be saying something along the lines of, "We don't believe Ms. Crispo will be found in the area near home". But perhaps they don't want to tip their hand either and are closer to solving this than we all realize. Whomever is out there and knows what happened to Sandra, they need to come forward and let the family have closure.
 
In 5 months it will be the 3 year mark. Its frustrating but understandable LE has not released any information. That being said the likelihood of someone coming forward now seems slim. It sounds like LE has an idea but not sharing. The local searches for Sandra continue although sparse. The likelihood of even finding much if anything seems bleek. With canine, drones, searches by LE it seems clear Sandra was taken elsewhere. Did neighbors speak up to LE and not publicly or not at all? Is LE focused on certain people vs no true idea. Imo why did Hanson and state police say the home was not a crime scene when a family member reported blood spattered. How did Sandras car pass inspection with a loud muffler as reported and brought in to be repaired by the mechanic?
 
Last edited:
It is unfortunate that going on three years since Sandra disappeared, the family has no closure. Some fairly exhaustive searches have been conducted in the immediate area of Sandra's home and surrounding areas. It seems (at least to me) that wherever she may be located is not near the site of her home. If she did indeed voluntarily leave (or was taken by force) her home and something happened to her after that point, it wouldn't seem logical that she would be found in the vicinity near home. I know that's been considered by LE, investigators, etc. Hypothetically, if she left home on foot and was perhaps hit by car (even by accident), the driver could have panicked and taken her with him/her without calling for help. It has happened in other cases. Obviously, this is all speculation. You would think that if LE were any closer to solving this, they would be saying something along the lines of, "We don't believe Ms. Crispo will be found in the area near home". But perhaps they don't want to tip their hand either and are closer to solving this than we all realize. Whomever is out there and knows what happened to Sandra, they need to come forward and let the family have closure.
Good points. I don't see LE tipping their hands with any kind of information to the public at all.
It's a complicated case to them due to solidifying motive from others. No body found. They might have clues in blood/dna samples but not out to public due to their investigation. It does not sound logical especially after all the LE/ people searches /drones/ water searches, that she would be found locally. I believe out to sea that night or the next, still.
 
In 5 months it will be the 3 year mark. Its frustrating but understandable LE has not released any information. That being said the likelihood of someone coming forward now seems slim. It sounds like LE has an idea but not sharing. The local searches for Sandra continue although sparse. The likelihood of even finding much if anything seems bleek. With canine, drones, searches by LE it seems clear Sandra was taken elsewhere. Did neighbors speak up to LE and not publicly or not at all? Is LE focused on certain people vs no true idea. Imo why did Hanson and state police say the home was not a crime scene when a family member reported blood spattered. How did Sandras car pass inspection with a loud muffler as reported and brought in to be repaired by the mechanic?
Maybe the year wasn't up for inspection time but that was never the reason said as I'd think it would be! It was because SIL said let's get it fixed before the Winter season. Her car was prob due for the insp in Dec if she got away without inspection sticker for 8 months. I've seen in two diff interviews with daughter in the past that Sandra called her saying car having trouble and wants to get it fixed. Two diff reasons given for car going into shop. Called her daughter while babysitting after daughter left for work is one. Sandra had gone a long time with the exhaust broken , 8 months. She had been in Hanson for three. Sandra didn't find or call a mechanic herself, her daughter/SIL did, the one they use, which would make sense as they knew the area and who they use. Just that timing..
 
Maybe the year wasn't up for inspection time but that was never the reason said as I'd think it would be! It was because SIL said let's get it fixed before the Winter season. Her car was prob due for the insp in Dec if she got away without inspection sticker for 8 months.

Did either of them say this involved her getting a sticker? I may have missed this. I've only heard they were concerned about noise and the neighbors. (although Sandra was not). With this said, she probably needed to deal with this type of issue before her inspection deadline, but August makes more sense than December if they were in some sort of rush to get the car fixed. Even if she needed an inspection by August, it was still early in the month, so no immediate pressing deadline.
 
Did either of them say this involved her getting a sticker? I may have missed this. I've only heard they were concerned about noise and the neighbors. (although Sandra was not). With this said, she probably needed to deal with this type of issue before her inspection deadline, but August makes more sense than December if they were in some sort of rush to get the car fixed. Even if she needed an inspection by August, it was still early in the month, so no immediate pressing deadline.
No never read/saw about a sticker, it was just said that 'let's get the car fixed before winter season. period. Hadn't read about noise concern of neighbors. It had been 8 months since she ran over a snowbank/ stuck, ruined underside/exhaust. Before winter was what was said by SIL.
 
But how did the sheet end up missing? Is it possible to harm someone in THAT area and then remove a body without anyone hearing or seeing something? Did the perp or perpetrators take s away from her home then returned and remove the sheet? Clean up? Also no mention whatsoever ever of s car needing a sticker. The story was, it was the winter was coming enough is enough, time to get this car fixed.
 
But how did the sheet end up missing? Is it possible to harm someone in THAT area and then remove a body without anyone hearing or seeing something? Did the perp or perpetrators take s away from her home then returned and remove the sheet? Clean up? Also no mention whatsoever ever of s car needing a sticker. The story was, it was the winter was coming enough is enough, time to get this car fixed.
I know, No one looked out their window when they were all saying byye when dropped off? No one saw another car/truck come after that? She might of been wrapped/ covered with the bottom sheet, pulled up over her if she ended falling on the bed, slats down. mattress disrupted. No, never the sticker was the reason.
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
314
Guests online
417
Total visitors
731

Forum statistics

Threads
608,745
Messages
18,245,163
Members
234,439
Latest member
Rice Cake
Back
Top