True, but would you agree that after looking at the fire damage in the crime scene photos, it was more than a lighter that did that?
Rocky1, Yes, unless he used some type of accelerant...lighter fluid ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
True, but would you agree that after looking at the fire damage in the crime scene photos, it was more than a lighter that did that?
It could very well be lighter fluid.Rocky1, Yes, unless he used some type of accelerant...lighter fluid ?
That's why the one shoe in the article I posted with photos of the memorial shrine gave me the creeps. Because it was all pairs and then one. Unless somehow it's the one they found but I doubt that since it's evidence. Glad I'm not the only one who owns a metal detector. We got a wand for my moms last year since I got her obsessed with the curse of oak island and hunting hitler and snake island. Maybe you could use yours at the site?Well we know they didn't find it on the first sweep because it was reported that the phone was missing. As were A single shoe and her clothes.
Finding things is actually my main passion in life. I've got an extensive collection of Native American artifacts that I've spotted in the dirt in the agricultural fields near where I live. I have been using a metal detector to look for old things since I was 12 years old, more than 20 years ago. I found some Roman coins in England this summer just where a Roman left them back in about 160 AD. I wonder if anyone went back to thoroughly check the scene after all of the undergrowth plants had died. It is amazing what you can see in winter that you can't see in summer.
What about the source of the fire being one of those long, click type lighters ? Click and flame, I think they are called. They are easy to use, and unlike a small bic type lighter, the user will not burn his fingers. The long lighters are often used to start BBQ' s, and it was summer. Not uncommon to have such a lighter in the car. jmo
Mine (iPhone) freezes abd reloads a lot so I copy my long replies as I got incase and longer replies lag abd it wont let ne indent or paragraph on any forums on it. But I feel the cops have a few people in mind but nobody set in their mind and no evidence so maybe they keep doing the DNA sweep to hopefully get a hit on one of the perps relatives but suspect multiple people in the area even for some small thing like dating or friends etcGrrr.... Take II or III... (Is it just me, or does anyone else get timed out on very quickly when using a cell phone to post, but not using the app? I don't like to load many apps on my phone....)
I'm pretty sure nobody has said they "believe that LE has a perp in mind" - just that it's one *possibility* in their minds that can't be ruled out.
That's where I stood before - and still stand, at least. Nothing in the family press conference or news reports about it (including the CBS one you posted after this post that I'm responding to) precludes that one specific and unusual scenario recently mentioned briefly again (that we can't explore) being a possibility, IMO.
For clarification, my view is broad here - meaning I think it's possible that there could be a relevant connection *of some sorts* betw the two events, not necessarily that the other person could be the perp.
Good post. Yup, I'd say the fact that the wording on the website her family set up makes it clear that where she was found was, indeed, where (or near where) she was killed.
As for your question, I'm pretty sure the wording used is just a matter of speech, with "after going for a run" meaning "after leaving for a run." I think you're asking if it has been determined whether she was killed near the beginning of her run or while returning (meaning almost home), correct? If that's what you mean, then no, that has not been determined. Its seems the general consensus on this board is that she was likely killed in the beginning of her run - just a half mile north of her mom's/aunt's house. However, it's also recently been brought up that she might have been doing a brief out and back run that day, which would have put her passing by the cart path twice in a relatively brief time. In which case, he could have grabbed her on her return, as well.
Yes, it's a nice website. Those poor people; nobody should have to suffer like that because there are sickos in this world. I'd bet they worried when she moved to NYC and would never imagine that something like this could happen a half mile from their home.
I agree.
I don't see any benefit at all with LE mentioning anything about the investigation 3+ months into it if they have solid leads.
If there are right about the SUV, it gives the perp a chance to flee, or cover his tracks etc.
If they are wrong about the SUV, that tells the perp LE is not even close, and may lead him to think he got away with this. That could make him act out again.
Personally, I think the reason they mentioned is because they have no solid leads. JMO.
I, too, am very interested in the burns. Let's confirm the torch theory or eliminate it completely.
And could her self defense class post made the person think he needed to act now before she goes and learns whatever could help her defend herself. Which shows obsession over her.
I for some reason thought it was near the KV case but I never saw it with my own eyes. Would she have known the girl? If so how close was the post she made(if anyone can find the date, I would but I'm about to pass out since its 7am) to the weird short run and privacy settings change?I thought the self defense class post was from like a year or more ago, when another young woman was abducted and killed in Boston.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I for some reason thought it was near the KV case but I never saw it with my own eyes. Would she have known the girl? If so how close was the post she made(if anyone can find the date, I would but I'm about to pass out since its 7am) to the weird short run and privacy settings change?
Morning all,
I was thinking, wouldnt LE take all the burned trees/branches for evidence? Or did they leave them there?
Morning all,
I was thinking, wouldnt LE take all the burned trees/branches for evidence? Or did they leave them there?