Thank you! That explains why it’s always around midday for meIt's usually around 8pm-10pm local time. Australians use to follow closely what's going on in Europe.
Thank you! That explains why it’s always around midday for meIt's usually around 8pm-10pm local time. Australians use to follow closely what's going on in Europe.
Sandra F tomorrow about material evidence against CB.
Sexta9 says that MM's abduction is "um crim de grupo".Sandra F tomorrow about material evidence against CB.
In the Sexta9 of last week, MS said that he had been asked by police whether he knew two Russians living in Spain. (And he denied)MS is speaking about two Russians in Spain when buying yachts? Could it be the yacht business front is actually a cover for human trafficking?
They are speaking about Nicole again mainly. We know NF is linked to yachts through MH. NF's adoptive son is in this episode. It talks about her being a dancer at a casino.
Crazy, I have seen most of this on this forum before.
Xmas attempted abduction interesting. I wonder who else was in prison with CB?From April 7, 2006 to December 21, 2006.
Thanks Mendel, I knew about him, should’ve been clearer that I meant who else?Michel Tatschl.
But why charge him of possession of child abuse/snuff , or would it be wise to try prove he was indeed the murderer and gather evidence so they can charge him with kidnap, abuse/rape of a child and murder ? I personally would of course think any proper LE would try for charges for everything ? JMOLet's get real
If he had images of the victim dead he would be charged in 2 seconds
Yeh I would say so, however, if it goes to trial they don't have a jury just the judge, so makes no real diff to the actual outcome of the verdict what the public think re the case anyways.Considering FF tried to overturn the rape of the 72 year old woman because CBs arrest wasn’t done in a certain way or wasn’t done in a certain country? It would not surprise me if he tries the argument that CB has not had a fair trial and the judgement will be preconceived because of the media.
So who could be paying for these uk solicitors???
They have said they cannot share the evidence. I don't know why - possibly lack of trust
I hope the payments are nothing to do with this, mentioned very early on in the threads.It's a high profile case and it's not beyond the realms of possibility that it's been taken on pro bono by perhaps a UK outfit that specialises in human rights because of the wider legal concerns - ie. the manner in which the investigation has been conducted.
No matter what anyone thinks of CB, he still has rights and they've been breached imo.
How have they been breached? The Germans have not named him.It's a high profile case and it's not beyond the realms of possibility that it's been taken on pro bono by perhaps a UK outfit that specialises in human rights because of the wider legal concerns - ie. the manner in which the investigation has been conducted.
No matter what anyone thinks of CB, he still has rights and they've been breached imo.
I hope the payments are nothing to do with this, mentioned very early on in the threads.
Madeleine McCann: German prisoner identified as suspect #2
How have they been breached? The Germans have not named him.
I cannot find any direct references to CB's full name by HCW but perhaps I am not googling it well. In any case, since in Germany it's not a jury who decides it doesn't really matter IMO if he has been named. All the 'work' of finding out about him and exposing his life and past has been done by tabloids and here. I don't see how his rights have been breached. He has not even been officially interrogated yet.They absolutely have. Wolters has referenced him publicly in interviews on numerous and very recent occasions. Google is your friend here.
My concern from the off is due process. And this is just not anything like due process and, for that reason, it continues to raise a really concerning red flag for me.