What do you mean by that exactly?
I believe that HCW's "concrete piece of evidence" is something that must happen after 10pm on 3rd May
It cannot come from any of the traditional 5A timeline witnesses
What do you mean by that exactly?
I agree. To warrant someone in HCW's position to say what he has, with conviction, does suggest something major like a video or photographic evidence.I believe that HCW's "concrete piece of evidence" is something that must happen after 10pm on 3rd May
It cannot come from any of the traditional 5A timeline witnesses
KM statement Sept 2007:This is the sort of thing I have been wondering about in my Carnival of Mirrors theory
Maybe the real circumstances are very different to what has always been assumed. If i recall the PJ material, I think the last time anyone outside the group claims to have seen MM alive is a period after 5pm? It seems a reasonable assumption she was put to bed after that. But if GM embellished his 9pm check but was actually watching football, when actually was the last time she was seen alive?
IMO this was simply a listen at the very slightly ajar bedroom door, with no visual check.Around 8:30-8:35 they left for the Tapas restaurant. Before leaving they checked on the children, she doesn't know who; however Gerry says it was him. She only knows the children were quiet.
That's an interestimg idea. IMO a small child could slide the lounge balcony door open and go out. However this would not explain how the bedroom window and shutter came to be open?
Your last paragraph is something I’ve thought about for quite some time Glad someone else has mentioned it !.This is the sort of thing I have been wondering about in my Carnival of Mirrors theory
Maybe the real circumstances are very different to what has always been assumed. If i recall the PJ material, I think the last time anyone outside the group claims to have seen MM alive is a period after 5pm? It seems a reasonable assumption she was put to bed after that. But if GM embellished his 9pm check but was actually watching football, when actually was the last time she was seen alive?
What blood splatters? The only thing I'm aware of was the blood dog and it would be very odd if a family with young children didn't have blood around.Somebody knows, if the origin of the blood splatters on the curtain and around and on the back of the sofa in the living room of 5A has ever been clarified?
Nose and cheek on this pic look more serious than like a typical sunburn to me...
View attachment 274195
Somebody knows, if the origin of the blood splatters on the curtain and around and on the back of the sofa in the living room of 5A has ever been clarified?
Nose and cheek on this pic look more serious than like a typical sunburn to me...
View attachment 274195
I'm guessing any evidence of anyone in 5A has either been contaminated or lost. None has been reported or asked about. Somebody clearly was but my guess is any evidence is from after MM was taken and we'll never get concrete proof of anyone being in there just circumstantial evidence from who ultimately had her.When asked whether or not he has proof of CB being inside the apartment, HCW said he does have an answer, but is not going to say it, because to give the answer would prompt more questions.
What do you make of this? If instead he gave a straight answer what would it would be?
Would it be "Yes I have evidence he was in 5A"?
or "No I do not have evidence he was in 5A"?
What blood splatters? The only thing I'm aware of was the blood dog and it would be very odd if a family with young children didn't have blood around.
I'm confused, Superdad. What are you asking/suggesting? That there's some possible link between the blood splatters in 5A and the colour of CB's nose/cheeks?
If you could clarify please and thanks.
I'm amazed PJ are refusing to hand over DNA - that's appalling.P.J. POLICE FILES: FORENSIC BLOOD SPOT TRACES
It fits the place where the blood tracing dog alerted?
Just thinking about the theory that MM left her bedroom frightened or in panic, without cuddle cat because of the panic, tried to hide behind or under the sofa in a low enlightened environment by running out of her room to the parents bedroom but the abductor was there?
The abductor could have pulled the sofa away and maybe the little girl kicked the abductor in the face for example....
According to the reports, it has been ruled out that the blood was MM's blood (PJ, SY?) and PJ refuses to hand out DNA samples to german prosecuters?
Maybe also a part of a confession like "She nearly or maybe broke my nose" or something as part of the puzzle...?
Also for that a credible T9 timelime would be that crucial.
I'm amazed PJ are refusing to hand over DNA - that's appalling.
That said it could be anyones blood and could have been there for months and there isn't much. It was also not evident with the naked eye so would have to have been cleaned up which would take time. Nosebleeds, cut knees, shaving cuts etc all very normal
Personally I don't think a small child could draw blood from a adult male. Not enough strength and very easily overpowered.
I'm not sure if a small child would run away from CB either. Nor make it far if they tried. When small kids wake up frightened don't they usually scream rather than run. Or get up and go to find their parents? Personally I think it would take more cognitive reasoning to run and hide.
That's just my opinion. I think if he spoke nicely about going to find mummy and daddy she'd have gone willingly
I watched the Australian '60 minute' video (somewhere above) and according to that, the PJ only took DNA samples from the apartment after it had been rented out - again! Is that correct?
Re blood spatters being asked about. Photos of these are in the PJ files .What blood splatters? The only thing I'm aware of was the blood dog and it would be very odd if a family with young children didn't have blood around.
What ? ! SCO’s would have taken those soon as .I watched the Australian '60 minute' video (somewhere above) and according to that, the PJ only took DNA samples from the apartment after it had been rented out - again! Is that correct?
I believe that HCW's "concrete piece of evidence" is something that must happen after 10pm on 3rd May
It cannot come from any of the traditional 5A timeline witnesses
But then if someone had been in the apartment previously, they're really taking a chance that MM wouldn't have mentioned it (or partly) the next day.There are links that show ways how that pattern could have been arisen, but i won't post them here, because these sites blame it on the parents and i do not follow that crappy theory.
In my opinion a terrified flight of MM could be explained by some horrible experience she made some days before, if the intruder has visited 5A in the days before.
And of course, if a defending child of three that is being abducted after hiding behind some furniture kicks your nose, you will likely bleed in seconds. In the past, when i used to cuddle or tickle my very young children, i had a lot of accidents regarding my handsome face and pretty smile! (just kidding!)
But as i wrote, it's a theory! Not more, not less....
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.th...l-cops-war-dna-evidence-madeleine-mccann/amp/