frank-cole
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2021
- Messages
- 530
- Reaction score
- 1,880
All i really take from the various comments on the evidence from HCW:
He doesn't have any forensics ... i.e from a crime scene
He has direct evidence (witness) but not to the crime
He has digital evidence of some kind, but its not direct.
Given circumstantial evidence is the common and broad - it doesn't take us far.
But lack of forensic evidence from a crime scene makes this a heavy lift. What will prove death, and that CB did it?
Great question. IMO and this is purely my interpretation of what’s been stated, I think they may have the following
Photo of MM post abduction (found amongst CB’s belongings)
The BKA wanted to corroborate the cell site data. They have his phone at the scene.
I do believe the strong new evidence is proof he was at the scene. Probably a picture or video of CB in the area on the afternoon/evening.
I think they appealed for information to place him at the scene, to show a clear link between CB being there and that picture (post abduction) being taken. That would make it almost impossible for FF to argue ‘prove he took that’ or ‘he got sent that’, because the BKA will show that CB himself was in the area when it happened.
That’s purely conjecture but I think it could be what they have. I also think they may have
Detailed online confession
Further disgusting online discussions
Evidence that CB was responsible for the recent burglaries in the OC
Witness testimony from people who knew him
Eye witnesses who saw him in the area on both the day and days prior
Search history or evidence CB was fixated on the status of the investigation
Movements after the crime
Drawings/paintings by CB that are eerily similar to MM &/or what may have happened
Unusual patterns of behaviour afterward
They have bank statements of his from 2007 (seized in 2018) which may show where and when he made purchases
just my opinion.
Cheers