Madeleine McCann: German prisoner identified as suspect #27

[C.greek]

You have misunderstood me ...once again !Nothing to do with plagiarising .
I was saying ( to another member) that I do wonder how people quote word for word what someone else has said . An example of which was what friends of CB said he said ....word for word


This is proof of what I was pointing out earlier . Much more than several pages ....gone from the PJ files . How was I to supply proof of those "on demand " in here ?
The fact remains that man was thoroughly investigated . Why those pages have gone we are not meant to know imo .

Thought you were referring to JC's book quotes. Mea culpa. As regards the other point you could have replied in a similar way to @misty48. Without stating as a fact that this is the man TS identified giving his initials and explaining what happened. It seems like you cannot be bothered to do this.
Maybe the pages are gone bc he is a paedo? Just a thought or he had completely nothing to do with the case?

 

[Lilly b]

Multiple MSM says he attended. And as DLK79 says, HCW is asked about it in JC’s book.
Also from the Mirror link above:

“The friend added: “He said that he went to answer the summons and he told police that he had nothing to do with it.

“I asked him ‘but why say that as you’re only a witness?’ He just said ‘let’s have a party!’.”

Wasn't he in his kiosk when he got the letter and mentioned it to someone, and he said, they have nothing on me?

True! We already speculated on here that they probably got what info they needed… Perhaps it was the case that they haven’t been able to rule out that he gave it to a gf (you could be right in suggesting NF)

… In the back of my mind, I keep thinking this is MWT this is coming from, though
And it doesn’t exactly match up to what he’s alluded to on Twitter previously… But who knows!

Either way, things might be about to get interesting. And at least we might have new info to fall out over

Didn't Nm the ex say, that CB had said he was there at the time, and leave it at that type of thing. And MWT, did mention something about 2 Russian brothers, and that's what be coming up in the 3 part programme?

 

[Lilly b]

Case against Madeleine McCann prime suspect set to crumble as he an 'alibi'

So just the British police say he has an alibi, I personally think this is just clickbait

 

[Lilly b]

Madeleine McCann prime suspect Christian B 'will see case crumble' Madeleine McCann prime suspect Christian B 'will see case against him crumble' | Daily Mail Online via Home | Daily Mail Online

So this info is just from MWT

 

[katydid23]

Madeleine McCann prime suspect Christian B 'will see case crumble' Madeleine McCann prime suspect Christian B 'will see case against him crumble' | Daily Mail Online via Home | Daily Mail Online

So this info is just from MWT

Isn't he a tv reporter that used to be a cop, 20 years ago?

 

[Chiatos]

Case against Madeleine McCann prime suspect set to crumble as he an 'alibi'

Of course he as an alibi. That's the first thing a prime suspect would work on.

Thirty minutes away coincide with those 6 kms mentioned by FF last year.
Nothing new here.

So called "leaving a time frame of 90 seconds to be able to do the deed".

 

[Lilly b]

Isn't he a tv reporter that used to be a cop, 20 years ago?

Yes, lots of crime stuff on his twitter

 

[Lilly b]

Of course he as an alibi. That's the first thing a prime suspect would work on.

Thirty minutes away coincide with those 6 kms mentioned by FF last year.
Nothing new here.

So called "leaving a time frame of 90 seconds to be able to do the deed".

So why hasn't FF ever said that, and also if, and I say if it's true, has he not said when spoken to as we mentioned a couple of pages ago, and several people have also said they seen him there like we discussed yesrday, by TS

 

[C.greek]

Of course he as an alibi. That's the first thing a prime suspect would work on.

Thirty minutes away coincide with those 6 kms mentioned by FF last year.
Nothing new here.

So called "leaving a time frame of 90 seconds to be able to do the deed".

So at 9.30 he was 30 minutes away supposedly... possibly the alibi will be provided by NF together with other people attached to them. Some still leaving in Portugal and NF in Germany

 

[C.greek]

So why hasn't FF ever said that, and also if, and I say if it's true, has he not said when spoken to as we mentioned a couple of pages ago, and several people have also said they seen him there like we discussed yesrday, by TS

FF had said that he talked to ppl in Portugal and that the outcome is that that would only leave 90 seconds to abduct MM.

Madeleine McCann suspect's lawyer: Phone records will prove innocence

 

[SuperdadV8]

Let's just see, what MWT may have found out. In 2020 he quoted to have identified the second caller, another german peado and that he reported it to the authorities.

The phrase "crumbling case" sounds more like the tabloid itself, not MWT. It's obvious, that there are doubts, after 4 years of investigation without a charge IMO.

Every kind of movement in the case can be seen as positive.

 

[Zuleika]

Are you alluding to having insider information or just looking for ways to avoid having to back up your baseless claims?

Insults are never acceptable in discussions although they do show up as the last throw of the dice to discredit .
I have seen the name in full of the person TS identified who was interviewed at length .

 

[C.greek]

Insults are never acceptable in discussions although they do show up as the last throw of the dice to discredit .
I have seen the name in full of the person TS identified who was interviewed at length .View attachment 329289

TS did not identify anyone! Where have you seen that ?

She said that she can recognise the man both personally and photographically, and create a photofit.

Therefore I interrupt the present deposition and show the deponent photographs of individuals with similar characteristics.

I resume the deposition where it is consigned that the diligence resulted negatively, according to a report that is annexed.

She didn't say anything further. The deposition is read and approved, ratified and signed together with the interpreter that assisted.

P.J. POLICE FILES: TMS AGED 12

 

[Denis R Tandib]

So at 9.30 he was 30 minutes away supposedly... possibly the alibi will be provided by NF together with other people attached to them. Some still leaving in Portugal and NF in Germany

There is going to be a problem with the timeline provided by the T9 group IMO. FF has conceded that there was a 90 second window but this could be much larger if the T9 statements are incorrect.

As per my earlier post on Tannerman, I think Redwood had some kind of breakthrough on the timeline. Unfortunately for HCW the timings are very well (and repeatedly) documented.

 

[C.greek]

There is going to be a problem with the timeline provided by the T9 group IMO. FF has conceded that there was a 90 second window but this could be much larger if the T9 statements are incorrect.

As per my earlier post on Tannerman, I think Redwood had some kind of breakthrough on the timeline. Unfortunately for HCW the timings are very well (and repeatedly) documented.

I am not sure if this would be related to the T7 (or T9?) timeline but mostly to the time KM entered the apartment and did not find MM.

 

[Zuleika]

TS did not identify anyone! Where have you seen that ?

She said that she can recognise the man both personally and photographically, and create a photofit.

Therefore I interrupt the present deposition and show the deponent photographs of individuals with similar characteristics.

I resume the deposition where it is consigned that the diligence resulted negatively, according to a report that is annexed.

She didn't say anything further. The deposition is read and approved, ratified and signed together with the interpreter that assisted.

P.J. POLICE FILES: TMS AGED 12

Honestly do you ever understand a thing I say ?
TS saw a man twice observing apartment 5A, and she helped to draw up an e-fit.That is what I meant by identified . She identified the likeness of the efit to the man she saw . He was subsequently interviewed at length . Please don't ask how the PJ got hold of him because I don't know . He could have gone to them voluntarily ?

 

[C.greek]

Honestly do you ever understand a thing I say ?
TS saw a man twice observing apartment 5A, and she helped to draw up an e-fit.That is what I meant by identified . She identified the likeness of the efit to the man she saw . He was subsequently interviewed at length . Please don't ask how the PJ got hold of him because I don't know . He could have gone to them voluntarily ?

When you say TS identified a man, it means that she herself identified a real person. Which did not happen

The PJ identified instead a man that they thought looked like the efit that TS created. She did not recognise any of the men, photos of whom she was shown that day. So to say that TS recognised or identified a specific man is completely wrong!

 

[Chiatos]

So why hasn't FF ever said that, and also if, and I say if it's true, has he not said when spoken to as we mentioned a couple of pages ago, and several people have also said they seen him there like we discussed yesrday, by TS

FF had said that he talked to ppl in Portugal and that the outcome is that that would only leave 90 seconds to abduct MM.

Madeleine McCann suspect's lawyer: Phone records will prove innocence

Yes, FF pretty much díd mention CB having an alibi, although never mentioning the exact word "alibi". It's his job to help his clients to come up with an alibi.

 

[Chiatos]

I must admit Zuleika, that I too interpreted your previous post #612 as though TS had actually identified an existing person (and had mentioned his full name).
Only after your explanation I understood what you actually meant.
(Sometimes writing / reading / understanding can prove to be rather difficult....)

 

[Denis R Tandib]

I am not sure if this would be related to the T7 (or T9?) timeline but mostly to the time KM entered the apartment and did not find MM.

Oops, maybe I have it wrong, I mean the whole group including GM and KM so KM’s 10pm check definitely included in the timeline.

I don’t think KM’s check is helpful with CB’s alibi though because MM isn’t there. The last confirmed sighting of MM is GM’s. Therefore, if I’m thinking straight, CB’s alibi is x travel time away plus 90 seconds after GM’s check.

Unless of course, the T7+/-2 timeline is out, then the 90 second window could be much larger.

hope this makes sense.