Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you think a video in CB’s possession showing either an abused or deceased Madeleine would be sufficient to guarantee a conviction? Paedophiles swap images all the time - if there was nothing in the footage that linked him to the scene of the crime then it would still be circumstantial evidence IMO.If he had anything like that he wouldn't be describing the evidence he has as circumstantial, Dave. At least not imo
And I doubt they could keep such a secret from the bunch of ravenously hungry tabloids in both countries.
I’m not seeing a cloth in that picture.Correio da Manhã said that PJ is searching for a "manta" (type of cloth, see picture) which disappeared along with MM. But it was not found in CB's cars or places. It did not say anymore.
View attachment 418899
Well if she disappeared before 10pm on 3rd, the blanket didn't. It's in the crime scene photos taken after midnight.Maddie McCann's blanket may be the solution to unravel the mystery of her disappearance
I think that would be enough. He'd be doomed if anything like that had been found. (imo)Do you think a video in CB’s possession showing either an abused or deceased Madeleine would be sufficient to guarantee a conviction? Paedophiles swap images all the time - if there was nothing in the footage that linked him to the scene of the crime then it would still be circumstantial evidence IMO.
Me neither. Maybe this type of sweater?I’m not seeing a cloth in that picture.
We shall see about that, Mex. I'm sure we can all think of high profile cases in which circumstantial cases are said to be strong by prosecution and media but which later turn out to have been weak. Juries are always under pressure to convict though.
All you know, tomorrow is May 3 (16 years after the crime).Maddie McCann's blanket may be the solution to unravel the mystery of her disappearance
Yes. But I read this Manta de Maddie McCann pode ser a solução para desvendar mistério do seu desaparecimento
Segundo o jornal, os investigadores da PJ acreditam que quem fez desaparecer Maddie terá levado também esta manta junto com a criança.
A polícia alemã procurou durante as buscas que realizou aos carros usados por CB e aos locais por onde este alemão passou depois do desaparecimento, mas nunca a encontrou.
Wolters said ...if they had photo evidence featuring both MM and CB it would be easy.....strange point to makeI think that would be enough. He'd be doomed if anything like that had been found. (imo)
I disagree. How would such a video prove he abducted, abused or murdered Madeleine? It would be cirumstantial.I think that would be enough. He'd be doomed if anything like that had been found. (imo)
Hi Heri, is Manta a blanket or could it be something else? My translator does not give me an answerAll you know, tomorrow is May 3 (16 years after the crime).
Maybe they must to write something ...
If anything like that had been found who'd believe a word he or his lawyer said about where it came from? Not sure I would. He'd be doomed.I disagree. How would such a video prove he abducted, abused or murdered Madeleine? It would be cirumstantial.
I disagree. How would such a video prove he abducted, abused or murdered Madeleine? It would be cirumstantial.
So if this was the evidence HCW is talking about you’d also be 100% convinced he abducted, abused and murdered Madeleine despite the fact that the video does not show him committing any of these acts?If anything like that had been found who'd believe a word he or his lawyer said about where it came from? Not sure I would. He'd be doomed.
The DM rape..and the other three pending rapes may well establish a particular pattern of abuse..if that's confirmed in a video he has of MM.....that would be enough. That would explain why he's putting the other cases first. Obviously I hope I'm totally wrongSo if this was the evidence HCW is talking about you’d also be 100% convinced he abducted, abused and murdered Madeleine despite the fact that the video does not show him committing any of these acts?
If they have her PJs &/or blanket fibres, I guess that is ‘concrete evidence’.it was used by the GNR dogs and it was on the pj photos. I wonder now that such news came out todayView attachment 418919
I'd be sure he'd be convicted. The charges he'd be convicted on wouldn't really matter, he'd be - probably forever - the only person ever convicted in the MM case, whatever the charge.So if this was the evidence HCW is talking about you’d also be 100% convinced he abducted, abused and murdered Madeleine despite the fact that the video does not show him committing any of these acts?