Taskforce88
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2017
- Messages
- 1,584
- Reaction score
- 4,854
People with personality disorders can 'split' though can't they? Favourite pets or people put on the 'good' side/ treated well. Whilst other people/animals are viewed on the bad side, abused and given completely different treatment...even their own children in some cases.
I think the German prosecutor’s strategy here is brilliant. He’s admitted that he doesn’t have enough evidence to prosecute, but he’s dribbling nuggets of CB’s depravity all over the world now, bit by bit. The last details about the contents of the USB/dead dog findings have to leave CB crawling out of his skin. There’s no chance of a semi-normal or even a safe existence for him in society ever again. He’s being exposed and his jailers are now his protectors.
Lots of us use splitting as a defence mechanism, it's not just specific to those with disorders.
Possibly but if CB is not charged, That is a very dangerous game to play, the Prosecutor could get in a lot of trouble and CB could sue the police force for a large amount and press I imagine.
Ok, but I was thinking more of people who show an abusive side to some but not others, If you see what I mean? It's gross but he could have erm.... abused some of his dogs and not others.
I think the German prosecutor’s strategy here is brilliant. He’s admitted that he doesn’t have enough evidence to prosecute, but he’s dribbling nuggets of CB’s depravity all over the world now, bit by bit. The last details about the contents of the USB/dead dog findings have to leave CB crawling out of his skin. There’s no chance of a semi-normal or even a safe existence for him in society ever again. He’s being exposed and his jailers are now his protectors.
He seemingly had relationships where the British girl said that he was "great" and everything was "normal" until she hugged someone else and then he lost control. It's too easy to say but it all sounds like "control"Ok, but I was thinking more of people who show an abusive side to some but not others, If you see what I mean? It's gross but he could have erm.... abused some of his dogs and not others.
He seemingly had relationships where the British girl said that he was "great" and everything was "normal" until she hugged someone else and then he lost control. It's too easy to say but it all sounds like "control"
Don't agree I have to say. The McCanns lost the case in Portugals 'highest court' because they ruled Amaral was allowed to express himself ( write a book ) ...just as the McCanns used the media ( photoshoots, writing a book etc.
I think that is fair, whatever you think of Amaral.
Definitely an element of control IMO. ...and power. In the relationships he tries hard to appear normal and that must be a huge effort that he can only do for a few months. The rapes and break in's seem to be about power, control and breaking people's personal boundaries ( complete amateur psychology view there, just my view)
Yeah and he likes his victims to be defenceless (bounded, gagged and blindfolded) his victims appear to be anywhere from 3 years old to 72 years old, and they are only ones we actually know of. I’m trying to work out what this guys MO is. The videos of sexual acts with dogs has threw me also. There is nothing off limits with this bloke. Literally nothing it seems...Definitely an element of control IMO. ...and power. In the relationships he tries hard to appear normal and that must be a huge effort that he can only do for a few months. The rapes and break in's seem to be about power, control and breaking people's personal boundaries ( complete amateur psychology view there, just my view)
Agreed - I am deeply uncomfortable with a prosecution that claims 100% conviction both in a murder and in his guilt yet at the same time lacks proof to charge. How can this be?
It sets a disturbing precedent
This may seem overly technical to some but the act of charging is an important differentiating moment in any prosecution. To move to charging the prosecutor must be certain in his own mind
1. That a crime was committed and if so, what crime it was
2. The the accused is the perpetrator.
I am hoping that somehow the proof of guilt lies in an inadmissible piece of evidence or some other technical issue with the case.
I wonder about the possible link to the little boy that went missing in PDL?Yeah and he likes his victims to be defenceless (bounded, gagged and blindfolded) his victims appear to be anywhere from 3 years old to 72 years old, and they are only ones we actually know of. I’m trying to work out what this guys MO is. The videos of sexual acts with dogs has threw me also. There is nothing off limits with this bloke. Literally nothing it seems...