KaaBoom
`·.¸¸ ><((((º> ...·´`·.¸¸ ><((((º>...·
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2012
- Messages
- 4,957
- Reaction score
- 3,199
They just lost $1.4 billion because of this. I think they could have offered a bit more than $800 to settle the matter without violence.
I just don't give a damn about his past (as it relates to this case).
This is assault and battery. And it's BS.
Airline staff claims he took a swing at security/police and he has a history of anger management issues, magical thinking and "poor decision making" these things are absolutely relevant. IKD who you are, if you are the slightest bit aggressive with police you are asking for trouble.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Airline staff claims he took a swing at security/police and he has a history of anger management issues, magical thinking and "poor decision making" these things are absolutely relevant. IKD who you are, if you are the slightest bit aggressive with police you are asking for trouble.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jeez for a buck - all they had to do was up the offer and someone else would have gotten off
I see this man owning United AIrlines in 18 years after it goes through the courts (kidding)
Not OK. moo
Airline staff claims he took a swing at security/police and he has a history of anger management issues, magical thinking and "poor decision making" these things are absolutely relevant. IKD who you are, if you are the slightest bit aggressive with police you are asking for trouble.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I just don't give a damn about his past (as it relates to this case).
This is assault and battery. And it's BS.
According to the Daily Mail article his WIFE was traveling WITH him. You'd think if the pull was computer generated they would at MINIMUM keep families together IMO
Can you even imagine if your name was pulled and you had your two children flying with you? Geez. Maybe some random common sense along with computer generation.