Someone help me out. I'm confused. What does whether or not it was a legal arrest have to do with anything? Obviously, an illegal arrest would open individuals up to a separate set of charges, but more specifically, what does the arrest being legal/illegal have to do with whether or not these cops are criminally responsible for the death of FG? Just not understanding the argument. It seems to me, it could have been a completely legal arrest but still an unlawful killing/injuring/whatever. In other words, just because you make a legal arrest, one does not get free rein to do whatever they want to the prisoner. And I'm passing no judgment on guilt/innocence. Have no clue at this point myself, but I am wondering why so much attention given to the legality of the underlying arrest.