VA VA - Mamta Kafle Bhatt, 28, mom & pediatric nurse, 'involuntary missing,' husband reported her missing Aug 5, Manassas Park, 31 July 2024 *Arrest*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Husband's LinkedIn -- cites he started new job Jan 2024 that still showed as his "present" employment. Obviously, it wasn't.

Bumping his LinkedIn. Not recalling anything about working at the "Whitehouse" -- even in his comments.
 
Moo...
The SS connection maybe related to him removing all the money from her checking account. Wondering, if he "hid the money in an overseas account". Did he send the money to his parents to protect for his get away?

I remember they filed 10 search warrants before they searched the house.
Moo
 
Moo...
The SS connection maybe h related to him removing all the money from her checking account. Wondering, if he "hid the money in an overseas account". Did he send the money to his parents to protect for his get away?

I remember they filed 10 search warrants before they searched the house.
Moo
I’m a local and it is extremely common here to be connected to the DoD, White House, IT, etc. The Secret Service would have been able to view his computer searches because his computer (even as a contractor) is government property. There is likely no money laundering, etc. It’s as simple as “he was our employee via contract so therefore we can look into what you did with our equipment”.
 
found it a bit unusual that he spared the child because it seems, IMO, that a lot of men who kill their wives have no patience for children. I guess they see the wife's leaving as an ultimate betrayal- also wonder if he told M that he was unemployed- if he was hiding financial problems and lying and it was all going to come out so he saw this crime as a way to avoid reality.
Daughter is US citizen. Something to think about and maybe as a leverage. Just first thougths.
 
To add onto that, “help desk” is enough to absolutely place him in the White House. It’s completely possible that he worked from home some days and was in office some days - or maybe he worked from home but under The White House. It is extremely common here to be a government contractor with a security clearance and still work from home. There are security clearance levels and some information can’t be shared outside of certain environments (meaning you would need to a) have the corresponding level of clearance and b) be in an authorized location ie a SCIF). He may have only dealt with unclassified information.
 
It appears he worked for a contracting company, perhaps with WH as client. WH link came from a now seemingly deleted post on FB congratulating him on house, baby, new gig. There have been a lot of IT layoffs, if he was unemployed, not necessarily for cause. More will come out in time. MOOO. People I know who work on such sensitive information all have to work in secured locations and he was said to be remote, so all seems a bit murky. IMHO.
Thank you, I did see the same FB post and already started to question. But it was there.

His current FB says under Intro: "Information Technology at U.S. Federal Government" (Link: Naresh Bhatt)

And, again, his LinkedIn mentions right below his name "IT Specialist DoD NMCI".

I do think now it was a contractor position (with the government as a client, but paychecks etc coming from another company). Perhaps only for a short time frame. And the job itself perhaps a bit exaggerated, who knows.
 
I’m a local and it is extremely common here to be connected to the DoD, White House, IT, etc. The Secret Service would have been able to view his computer searches because his computer (even as a contractor) is government property. There is likely no money laundering, etc. It’s as simple as “he was our employee via contract so therefore we can look into what you did with our equipment”.
Respectfully ...

It does not fall under the scope of service mandated by Congress for the Secret Service. The Secret Service just can't jump into an investigation. They are responsible for our banking system, money cyber security and protecting the protectees mandated by Congress.

No, the Secret Service could not randomly review his computer, unless within their scope of service. The FBI could and it does fall under the FBI as the federal investigative agency.

I'm very familiar with government and the powers of each department. Have hosted, planned, executed numerous events with the Secret Service and Congressional protectees.

I'm also very aware of government contractors. This man did not work for the White House and no one has been able to produce any documentation showing that he did.

My opinion, either the media misspoke as to the agency or there's more to the story and I'm betting it's related to money.

Moo...
 
Last edited:
Prosecutors told the court that investigators at the scene saw what looked like blood spatter and staining in the master bedroom and bathroom areas of their home. Some of that blood appeared as if someone had been dragged.

Investigators said technology used at the scene helped to identify that large amounts of blood had once been on the bathroom floor and saw that blood was stuck in parts of the bathtub.

Investigators have not yet confirmed if the blood belongs to Mamta. They are awaiting test results.

Elaborating on that search of their home, prosecutors say investigators found the home in disarray Wednesday. Many items were already boxed and packed up, with passports for both Naresh and his one-year-old daughter ready to go.
 
Again, I'm asking for a link for the White House position. So far no one can provide.
Here are the results for searching "White House" on his facebook page. There is a post that he is tagged in that says "Thank you Naresh Bhatt White house Employee, Us Army Veteran , US fairfax county Law enforcement officer (Police) and many more for this historical trip .Proud of your accomplishments keep doing great things…."

 
Respectfully ...

It does not fall under the scope of service mandated by Congress for the Secret Service. The Secret Service just can't jump into an investigation. They are responsible for our banking system, money cyber security and protecting the protectees mandated by Congress.

No, the Secret Service could not randomly review his computer, unless within their scope of service. The FBI could and it does fall under the FBI as the federal investigative agency.

I'm very familiar with government and the powers of each department. Have hosted, planned, executed numerous events with the Secret Service and Congressional protectees.

I'm also very aware of government contractors. This man did not work for the White House and no one has been able to produce any documentation showing that he did.

My opinion, either the media misspoke as to the agency or there's more to the story and I'm betting it's related to money.

Moo...
Security in the White House falls under Secret Service. His computer activity (using their networks/devices) would fall under their domain. There is no other governing body for his computer searches while under The White House.

As for proof of his employment, the building that he reported to for work would not be his employer. How many CIA contractors (or employees) have “Pentagon” as their employer - none. They have their contractor - GDIT, BAE Systems, etc.
 
Last edited:
Here are the results for searching "White House" on his facebook page. There is a post that he is tagged in that says "Thank you Naresh Bhatt White house Employee, Us Army Veteran , US fairfax county Law enforcement officer (Police) and many more for this historical trip .Proud of your accomplishments keep doing great things…."


This page isn't available​

The link you followed may be broken, or the page may have been removed​

 
Here are the results for searching "White House" on his facebook page. There is a post that he is tagged in that says "Thank you Naresh Bhatt White house Employee, Us Army Veteran , US fairfax county Law enforcement officer (Police) and many more for this historical trip .Proud of your accomplishments keep doing great things…."

This link does not work there's no post there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
152
Guests online
500
Total visitors
652

Forum statistics

Threads
608,455
Messages
18,239,634
Members
234,374
Latest member
Username4
Back
Top