Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wonder if Goodson stepped on the gas when he got the call that assistance was needed with Donta Allen. Maybe that is when FG got injured?
Do those vans have lights and sirens?
Boytwnmom-- can you discuss possible severing (or not) of the six officers' trials? If the charges proceed, that is.
Look at how much crime has gone down over the years. Putting these people in jail has been very good for our country.
I agree. I'm a strong supporter of "broken windows" policing. Most especially in areas with high rates of other crimes such as drugs, robbery, murder, and other violent crimes. It is the only thing that works, IMO.
This. So much this.Based on what Ive seen of the case, I certainly hope so. Justice is not being served if these mens lives and careers are ruined as part of a political witch hunt.
<modsnip>
Hi all, old timer here. I haven't posted in a few years, but I wanted to add to this thread. I am a native Baltimorean so this case is of great interest to me. A couple of things:
I don't know if this info has been posted before, but these officers did what is called a 'Terry stop'. Here is a link explaining what that is, and why FG's 4th amendment rights were not violated: http://http://definitions.uslegal.com/t/terry-stop/ The spokesperson for the police even referred to it this way in a local newscast. The police are allowed to briefly detain and do a limited search on individuals in areas of high crime activity without rising to the level of 'probable cause'. They need only 'reasonable suspicion' which they got when FG took off running as soon as he saw them, particularly as a known, convicted drug dealer in a very crime-ridden area. Whether you personally agree with this or not is a moot point, IMO, since the courts upheld it in 1968. Under the rules of a 'Terry stop' the police can search for and make an arrest for an illegal weapon.
I am repeatedly seeing incredulity that the police said that FG's arrest was without incident when he ended up dead. AFAIK, the term 'arrest' refers to the actual apprehension of the individual, as opposed to what may have happened during the transport, which would be referred to as 'in custody'. When whatever happened to FG happened, he was in custody. His arrest had already taken place, and since we have video and still shots of him standing and moving around on his own, to my eye it would appear to be without incident as well.
As far as Lt. Rice goes, he is not the one that is charged with murder. The manslaughter charge, as far as I know, relates to the (arguably) illegal arrest and subsequent false imprisonment, as well as the denial of medical treatment to FG. While the incident(s) outlined in the Guardian articles are certainly egregious and alarming, there has been no evidence released that he has done anything unprofessional relating to his duties as a police officer. Plus we have no idea what the follow up with the department was. Perhaps he had to medically cleared by a mental health professional and is subject to ongoing counseling as a condition to keep his job. My point is, WE DON'T KNOW. I would think that if this info, however sensational and tabloid worthy, is germane to the FG situation, it will come out at trial and we will learn more then.
I personally feel that all of the officers were overcharged and many of the charges will never go to trial. I do think that Goodson will be found guilty of some sort of negligence, and I also believe that he may be guilty of that, but I also think that it will be a tough row to hoe to prove murder when no one has been able to say exactly what happened to FG. If I were a juror I don't think that I could find someone guilty of a crime that carries a possible 30 year sentence if I wasn't sure of exactly what happened to him. It will be interesting to see the ME report(s) when they finally come out. I have thought about the osteoporosis/lead poisoning angle as well as others have here. If he did have it, then I don't see how the police can be held responsible for his neck being in a weakened state as they had no way to know that. I would think that they would only be required to do what a 'reasonable and prudent' person in their position would do under the law.
I am also reserving judgement until the video showing the 'secret stop' comes out. Do we know for sure that FG was seen during that stop? I had not seen anything other than a shop owner took the video...
At any rate, it is an interesting and sad case all around. I tend to be very pro-LE, so I am trying to be as unbiased as I can be in forming opinions about the case. Not to mention, so very little about the actual facts has been released. JMO, and all that jazz...:twocents:
I think law abiding citizens have a right to live in a neighborhoods that are free from petty thieves and drug dealers in alleys, whether they be black, white, yellow, red, pink or blue. It can be a thankless job when arrests are made and the perpetrators are released the next day. Who benefits? Where does the drug money end up?
I won't demonize LE until I see evidence that an officer did something intentionally wrong. As, for protecting drug addicts from society, we need to come up with something better than pouring more money into the inner city neighborhoods. Obviously, that has not solved anything except make a few people rich.
Should there be areas where drug use is allowed? Legally, and freely? Don't know but what we are doing as a society does not seem to be working. And LE is caught in the middle. imo.
I just kind of assume that even if these are bad cops they would at least yell "stop" at some point in the chase. They obviously weren't planing on running an endurance race to see who was the best runner. And Freddie had to know they were cops.
Why would they not yell "stop"?
This. So much this.
Nobody is praising FG.
But six police officers ARE charged in his death.
And until we hear otherwise, there is no reason to believe these charges are false.
Why are people so intent on finding ways to insist LE is not reponsible when plenty of evidence and CHARGES suggest they are?
Yes, a trial will be the deciding factor. But c'mon. Why are some people on a mission to insist LE is innocent of any wrongdoing? WS is supposed to be victim-friendly.
If, after a trial, the LEOs are found not guilty, then, that is another story.
There are bad people in every walk of life. LE is no exception. <modsnip>
Nobody is praising FG.
But six police officers ARE charged in his death.
And until we hear otherwise, there is no reason to believe these charges are false.
Why are people so intent on finding ways to insist LE is not reponsible when plenty of evidence and CHARGES suggest they are?
Yes, a trial will be the deciding factor. But c'mon. Why are some people on a mission to insist LE is innocent of any wrongdoing? WS is supposed to be victim-friendly.
If, after a trial, the LEOs are found not guilty, then, that is another story.
There are bad people in every walk of life. LE is no exception. <modsnip>
Based on what Ive seen of the case, I certainly hope so. Justice is not being served if these mens lives and careers are ruined as part of a political witch hunt.
<modsnip>
Nobody is praising FG.
But six police officers ARE charged in his death.
And until we hear otherwise, there is no reason to believe these charges are false.
Why are people so intent on finding ways to insist LE is not reponsible when plenty of evidence and CHARGES suggest they are?
Yes, a trial will be the deciding factor. But c'mon. Why are some people on a mission to insist LE is innocent of any wrongdoing? WS is supposed to be victim-friendly.
If, after a trial, the LEOs are found not guilty, then, that is another story.
There are bad people in every walk of life. LE is no exception. <modsnip>
WTH, Mosby was on stage??????
LOL, she clearly DOES NOT get it.