Totally unrelated article: http://bangordailynews.com/2012/02/...leaves-home-walks-nearly-a-mile-to-the-store/
But this little girl managed to get out of her home without waking her parents or siblings and walk a mile to the store! Thank God for a miracle in her case, she was found unharmed.
Anything is possible...:twocents:
ETA: She got out undetected, and I don't think she would have been trying to quiet her movements...
How do you know this? Does Trista know more about the blood findings than we the public know? If so, that doesn't make sense to me that LE would tell her confidential information.
Here's why I find that odd, and I hope I can articulate my thoughts without sounding like I'm being rude or picking on Trista. First, I can understand why LE doesn't release all information to the public. However, releasing information to Trista presents a high risk that the information will be released to the public via her. That's already happened, right? Same goes for private info they give to the other POI's, except they aren't talking. Also, I'm probably being dense, but if the victim (Trista) knows a lot of unreleased details and the DiPietro's (who are considered suspects whether LE came out and said it or not) know a lot of unreleased details, then what harm is there in releasing those details to the public?All those directly involved, or affected, know a lot more of the investigation than what the public is aware. This goes for TR ,JD, ED, CR & PD....And likewise there is a lot more that the MSP has not divulged....to anyone. Why would you find that odd? They are ALL part of the investigation and are going to be questioned about things that the public is not aware.
I can only say that the scenario you described above is a totally different situation. In the basement of JD's house it was in one place, not all over the house, and it was "more than a cut" and more than you've described on the cut foot of your friend's child. When the police stated "more than a cut" that means....any cuts to feet by accidental cuts is not consistent with what they have found.
BBE. Ok, I'm playing devil's advocate a bit now with my post. They *should*, according to you and those that think like you. Let us assume that the DiPietro's are innocent, as hard as that may be for the majority to assume. Now let us assume that LE thinks they are guilty of something, which appears to be the case. For the DiPietro's and CR to come out talking to the media or to open questions by LE, puts them in a position where everything they say can get twisted or misinterpreted and could eventually end up with them getting arrested and even found guilty and sent to jail. Now...most of you will say something like "well, if it was my child that was missing, I wouldn't care about myself or going to jail. I would just do everything I could and talk to everyone in hopes to find her". Well, not everyone thinks like that. If these people are innocent, why risk going to jail when nothing they can say or do can help get Ayla back? This same opinion applies to the Bradley case and probably others that I don't follow as well.If JD and family are being honest in believing that Ayla was taken from the home by a stranger (or got out of the house on her own), then they should, IMO, be disputing everything LE has said, and encouraging, even begging, the public to disregard the insinuations and just keep looking for Ayla. They should not be concerned with "how things look" or how they are being made to feel, which is basically all we have heard from them. And then once LE says (more than once) that they are free to speak out, we hear...nothing.
BBE. Ok, I'm playing devil's advocate a bit now with my post. They *should*, according to you and those that think like you. Let us assume that the DiPietro's are innocent, as hard as that may be for the majority to assume. Now let us assume that LE thinks they are guilty of something, which appears to be the case. For the DiPietro's and CR to come out talking to the media or to open questions by LE, puts them in a position where everything they say can get twisted or misinterpreted and could eventually end up with them getting arrested and even found guilty and sent to jail. Now...most of you will say something like "well, if it was my child that was missing, I wouldn't care about myself or going to jail. I would just do everything I could and talk to everyone in hopes to find her". Well, not everyone thinks like that. If these people are innocent, why risk going to jail when nothing they can say or do can help get Ayla back? This same opinion applies to the Bradley case and probably others that I don't follow as well.
Maybe I've watched too many true life interrogations on TV to know just how brutal LE can be. If an innocent person has been subjected to that, I can see why they would not want to endure it again.
Here's why I find that odd, and I hope I can articulate my thoughts without sounding like I'm being rude or picking on Trista. First, I can understand why LE doesn't release all information to the public. However, releasing information to Trista presents a high risk that the information will be released to the public via her. That's already happened, right? Same goes for private info they give to the other POI's, except they aren't talking. Also, I'm probably being dense, but if the victim (Trista) knows a lot of unreleased details and the DiPietro's (who are considered suspects whether LE came out and said it or not) know a lot of unreleased details, then what harm is there in releasing those details to the public?
I guess the question is "does the public have a right to know" certain things. It would be nice to at least know what the DiPietro's gave as a story for what happened that night and why LE thinks it is false or has information withheld. The only info the public has been given is what we learned from Angela Harry's blog. I'd like to know precisely why LE has discounted the abduction theory.
BBE. Ok, I'm playing devil's advocate a bit now with my post. They *should*, according to you and those that think like you. Let us assume that the DiPietro's are innocent, as hard as that may be for the majority to assume. Now let us assume that LE thinks they are guilty of something, which appears to be the case. For the DiPietro's and CR to come out talking to the media or to open questions by LE, puts them in a position where everything they say can get twisted or misinterpreted and could eventually end up with them getting arrested and even found guilty and sent to jail. Now...most of you will say something like "well, if it was my child that was missing, I wouldn't care about myself or going to jail. I would just do everything I could and talk to everyone in hopes to find her". Well, not everyone thinks like that. If these people are innocent, why risk going to jail when nothing they can say or do can help get Ayla back? This same opinion applies to the Bradley case and probably others that I don't follow as well.
Maybe I've watched too many true life interrogations on TV to know just how brutal LE can be. If an innocent person has been subjected to that, I can see why they would not want to endure it again.