jillycat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 2,746
- Reaction score
- 11,841
I usually respectfully snip longish posts for the sake of saving space but I couldn't bring myself to do it to your post.
The "tower jumpers" analogy is so appropriate in this case and a myriad of others that include reactions like "how could s/he do this to..... Fill in the blank. IMO.
And, I recall, in the aftermath of the towers falling, there were similar reactions to the" choice" to jump. I believe that in one case, a family preferred to believe that their loved one simply slipped and fell, perhaps feeling that their loved one's decision to escape the inescapable searing heat and smoke by jumping was somehow a cowardly act.
IMO, based on memories of the day and a documentary I watched about the subject. I think it was called The Falling Man.
Yes, there was also an analysis I read not too long ago that discussed the jumpers, and I believe in one case the 'decision' was made within 4 minutes of the plane impact. It was a discussion of intent vs fell vs collapse of parts of the building taking people with the collapse. There were around 200 people in those statistics.
As we can see in the case of the 9/11 jumpers there is still an element of taboo and judgment even in a known case of all hope was truly lost.
Even the resources specific to suicide loss only have so much to offer. And some of them are ideologically-based. I sincerely wish her family so much comfort, to the extent that anything can be comforting.