wasnt_me
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2010
- Messages
- 5,417
- Reaction score
- 10,986
Thank you, miley
So if all this is true (not referring to you, miley, but the information), then they were able to test it enough to know it was semen, but couldn't test it enough to get the dna???? And if there were two stains that may have compromised each other, then how do they know the one they tested wasn't in fact, compromised by the other stain?? I'm the farthest thing from a scientist, but that all just sounds....hinky. :waitasec:
I agree. I'm on the fence about the choice they made in testing blood over Semen as well.
The reason is, they knew, or after testing should have known, that the majority if not ALL, the blood on the pillow was MK's. So for that particular spot, I say they should have risked just testing the semen.
Also, I guess they think it was on RG's shoe because it was mixed in the shoe print? Because to my understanding they don't have RG's shoes, just a box that they were sold in.