To be completely honest, it was her attitude. Both of their attitudes. Now that doesn't make them guilty, does it? But we are all human and it does color the lens through which I interpret everything else that was presented.
In recently reading more about Mignini, I'm starting to back off a little from being 100% of AK and RS's guilt.
I just cannot for the life of me understand why someone who is being falsely accused doesn't show more emotion or sobbing pleas for justice/release? I guess it's conceivable that after awhile some sort of desensitization occurs: if she was living with these accusations day in and day out, then after awhile you've cried a river and may not have much left. Whereas we only saw glimpses of her and for me I couldn't understand why she wasn't sobbing each time. But I guess one would have to learn how to survive on a day-to-day basis and not grovel in self-pity constantly.
Today is the first time I have seen any emotion that to me - a psychologist - indicated genuine fear and an understanding of the severity of the situation.
I have been given a lot to think about recently and I'll take it all to heart. I am still leaning towards guilty, though, but I do understand how RG could be 100% responsible alone. The story of a robbery gone bad and turned into a rape/murder makes sense and I could see how that could have happened.
God bless the Kercher family - the number one victims here. Well, number two: Meredith was number one...