Why? Because of the similarities of course. Both murdered and got away with it, both behaved completely careless right after they murdered, both willfully obstructed police investigations and got convicted for it, both lied and lied and lied. The main difference is that the convicted criminal CA is not being put on a pedestal like the convicted criminal AK. Although...
Because he had an alibi.
Insensitive? Did not come across that way at all , to me. This case is different, as there were 2 wrongly accused, wrongly convicted, according to the Italian appellate court. So this is not the simplistic black hat versus white hat case...there were 3 victims.
Needs reformation. Really needs reforming.
Both murdered and got away with it? Why did the appellate court not see it that way? Judge Hellman said the evidence is not there. What is your confidence based on? Intuition? The Anthony case is vastly different from this case.
This was rumor. She wasn't fired, not for that, nor anything else. Yes, he texted her and said it was not busy, so she could have the night off. He was still acting as her boss.
Well, you will have to take that up with Judge Hellman, who said, the crimes were not committed. Why would he acquit murderers? One victim, one killer.
Of course we have to agree to disagree. The appellate phase was not about the victim, Kercher. At this point, it was about whether Knox and Sollectio were wrongfully convicted or not. The high judge said they were. But people seem unable to respect his ruling.
Yes, but turnabout is fair play. We heard over and over that Massei ruled her a convicted criminal. So now Hellman has ruled her an acquitted one.:innocent:
