In relation to this that I posted earlier:
I found this poster on JREF really summed it up extremely well, and it is worth excerpting from:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...ut-the-fight-goes-on-for-Meredith-family.htmlMeredith's frail-looking mother Arline, 65, said: "We are talking to our lawyers... " But then Stephanie interrupted: "We want to find out, if they are not guilty who is."
Arline was asked if she thought Knox was innocent and added: "I don't really know at the moment — I just had the verdict and no explanation. It has been a difficult few years let alone difficult few days."
I found this poster on JREF really summed it up extremely well, and it is worth excerpting from:
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=7649418#post7649418I really hope the motivational report from Hellman debunks the "evidence" suggesting multiple attackers being present at the cottage. I know that at least the luminol prints will be refuted because one of those prints was a probable match to Knox (with the exception of the second toe) and she has been absolved of the crime. This must mean Hellman and his jury disregarded the luminol findings as not being related to the crime. That just leaves the ambiguous bathmat print and the violent nature of the murder left.
If the jury determined that these two issues were also not indicative of multiple attackers, then that would put to rest the notion that "others" were involved. This would compel the Kerchers to drop their pursuit for the phantom assailants and finally try to move on with their lives.