slowpoke
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2010
- Messages
- 2,920
- Reaction score
- 19,025
Recap:
It has been stated that witness has a video of Jenny on her FB, which I am presuming must have been from when witness spent time with her earlier in Jenny's MX travels, before she disappeared...maybe it was from around Mar 2016?
2016 - Witness joins the HFJ fb page. I don't know when she did, but the fb page was started in Apr 2016.
Feb 2017 - The witness "saw and talked" to Jenny in Zocalo square, Mexico City.
Sept 3 2017 - JR asks witness "please PM me", so I presume this is around the time she reported the Zocalo sighting to JR.
Ok, to state the obvious, in Feb 2017 the sighting is true or it isn't:
The witness saw and talked to Jenny.
Or
The witness saw and talked to someone she believed was Jenny. Or
The witness did not see or talk to such person, yet reported this sighting as having actually taken place.
Thinking of scenarios for the sighting to be believable, in light of the long wait to report it.
It feels like she spent enough time and was familiar enough with Jenny that she would know if it was really her or not in Zocalo. She saw AND talked to her, is the claim. So, what did the witness tell JR? One scenario: That she believed it was Jenny, but Jenny acted as if she didn't know her, so she doubted herself and that's why she didn't report it right away, maybe?
If a sighting is made up, it's because for some reason the person wants others to believe the information is true. What reasons would one want to do that? Wanting to give JR hope, albeit based on false information? Make themselves feel like a important person? Or can a mind come to truly believe that a meeting happened, when it really did not, maybe for desiring it to be true so strongly? Reward?
It has been stated that witness has a video of Jenny on her FB, which I am presuming must have been from when witness spent time with her earlier in Jenny's MX travels, before she disappeared...maybe it was from around Mar 2016?
2016 - Witness joins the HFJ fb page. I don't know when she did, but the fb page was started in Apr 2016.
Feb 2017 - The witness "saw and talked" to Jenny in Zocalo square, Mexico City.
Sept 3 2017 - JR asks witness "please PM me", so I presume this is around the time she reported the Zocalo sighting to JR.
Ok, to state the obvious, in Feb 2017 the sighting is true or it isn't:
The witness saw and talked to Jenny.
Or
The witness saw and talked to someone she believed was Jenny. Or
The witness did not see or talk to such person, yet reported this sighting as having actually taken place.
Thinking of scenarios for the sighting to be believable, in light of the long wait to report it.
It feels like she spent enough time and was familiar enough with Jenny that she would know if it was really her or not in Zocalo. She saw AND talked to her, is the claim. So, what did the witness tell JR? One scenario: That she believed it was Jenny, but Jenny acted as if she didn't know her, so she doubted herself and that's why she didn't report it right away, maybe?
If a sighting is made up, it's because for some reason the person wants others to believe the information is true. What reasons would one want to do that? Wanting to give JR hope, albeit based on false information? Make themselves feel like a important person? Or can a mind come to truly believe that a meeting happened, when it really did not, maybe for desiring it to be true so strongly? Reward?