Momma2cam
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2016
- Messages
- 2,330
- Reaction score
- 5,940
Do you think we will see more murder trials in cases where the bodies haven't been found?
I've followed cold cases that were decades old, but never in a systematic way. In general, it seems like cases are getting resolved more quickly than they were even five or ten years ago, but the no-body cases are still tough, and it may be that more murderers are hiding the bodies now that everyone knows about DNA evidence. Fortunately, Michigan is one of the States where some prosecutors are willing to take on no-body cases. I hope we can get to the point where someone's sudden disappearance from the world under suspicious circumstances will be treated as strong enough evidence of death to bring murder charges.
I would argue that most prosecutors will take on no body cases but only when there is a strong case of circumstantial evidence, especially when including DNA. It is a very dangerous slope to start charging individuals with murder when the evidence is not strong, with or without a body. You get one shot and you don't want to charge with a likely case of reasonable doubt with a jury OR convict the wrong person. In this case, LE may have circumstantial evidence with DNA linkage but they have not released that nor even named a person of interest or suspect so to presume the prosecutor just doesn't want to take on no body cases seems misguided. Jmo.
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk