This is so far fetched I feel dumb even posting this but could the security guard, if he had anything to do with this, of been able to ensure that the specific camera in sights of her car at metlife was uh, "not functioning properly" that day? You hear alot of stories even in large nice buildings, where the LE or media say "the building did have security cameras but the specific camera wasn't working on the day x went missing"
In fact, when my husband was in the hospital, someone smashed into my parked car. This was at a really nice hospital and when I reported it to security I was eventually told that they had security cameras in my parking area but the camera that would of captured the person who backed into my car and drove off wasn't functioning at the time, meaning "we have a bazillion security cameras and take our sweet old time fixing one when it goes down" lol.
Again it's probably stupid to even suggest that, but it does happen alot. Just typing this out I can remember a few other instances of places having security cams that weren't working properly at the time they were really needed.
And being a security guard there would make it easier for him to somehow ensure the camera wasn't rolling. I know he wasn't the only guard and that a place that large would have alot of security guards that could catch him if he tampered or noticed it was not working and took initiative to fix it but I also can imagine other guards just chalking a non working camera as something not that unusual
