Spellbound
falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2013
- Messages
- 19,026
- Reaction score
- 37,306
Do you seriously think the courts are going to give up the photos to anyone other than officers of the court??? If they did it would be considered Distributing Child *advertiser censored* for goodness sakes!! OR is it NOT child *advertiser censored* at all???
I thought I had read in a previous post by MiMommy, that the pictures were questionable. Trojan and I also had a phone call from Kim say's that she supposedly carried the copies of the pictures in question in her purse, so I don't know this for certain, but it could be possible that more then a few people have seen what ever Kim was carrying around with her in her purse. IMO
LE would NOT return questionable pictures. Whatever KT carried in her purse would have been on a camera/cell phone or physical copies. Which means either downloaded pics, or actual photos on "paper". I am starting to suspect from some of our posts whether KT is also involved in the child *advertiser censored* possession --- ? Carrying such pics, defending so vigorously ..... are these pics of their own children? If so, do they think they are "artistic", but LE considers them objectionable?