:+:MrTT:+:,
Apr 17, 2017 Controversy post when i made it back in 17. It may get deleted now. I've notice the mods are deleted my posts from time to time over time, which makes it much harder to remember the mind set when things were posted.
I just read your post from April 17, 2017.
Makes me wonder now as well.
Here is your post.
:+:MrTT:+:Cold Case Files
I have read very little. But if you would like a theory outside the box. Perhaps wayyyyyyy outside the box. I can do that.
I know from most i have read the focus has been on the step father and i am not trying to change that. Just posting outside the box.
November 8 2012 Obama won his second term.
On 11/25/12...This was posted
Sixth Circuit’s Civil Rights decision holds
Julia responding to it with this.
Julia Niswender, a junior studying communications and film studies, disagreed.
[FONT=Georgia, Times, Times New Roman, serif]“I think it’s wrong,” Niswender said. “Everyone should be treated equal, and getting rid of it doesn’t seem fair.”[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times, Times New Roman, serif]IF that was published on the 25th, Julia gave her answer/opinion perhaps a few days earlier.
On December 10 2012 she was found dead. Fifteen days after the article was published. Two weeks lets say.
I read she did date non whites. Which I took that to mean blacks?
Julia disagreed about letting blacks into the college based on their race. Which at the time with all going on with PC politics and so forth , a statement from a white person would/mayhave some calling her racist. A sign at the times. And yet she dated/interests in black men.
From what i read about the crime scene. Strange that she was binded they say with hands behind her back, and mayber ankles. But they mentioned her clothes were cut off? Why bind her and THEN cut her clothes off. Not of them i read just parts of her clothing, but why? Why not remove them first and then bind her?? Just seems strange to me, to bind her and then cut her clothes instead of removing htem and then binding her.
I read her phone/cell phone was found underneath her in the tub. Could have been laying on the edge of the tub and fail in. Or was on her person, when put in the tub after having her clothes cut off and fail in.
Did Julia run the water, and was preparing to take a bath. Or did the killer/killers run the water while she was bound and then cut off parts of her clothing and then put her in the tub along with the cell phone.??
Perhaps she heard an entruder and ran to the bathroom and was going to call 911 and they broke in on her and through it in the tub and didnot remove it when they filled it with water?
Which would explain her clothes being cut. They got in the bathroom bind her, tossed the phone in the , fail in whatever and filled it with water, and then cut her cloths off, parts of them for whatever reason before placing her face down in the tub covering her cell phone with her body.
But before i read how she was found, about the clothing being cut and some removed from her, I had imagine she was already in the tub, soaking in it and perhaps browsing her cell phone while she was soaking. And someone broke in on her while she was in the tub and she dropped it in the tub or they knocked it out of her hands and it fail in.
But I guess thats not what happened.
As I said at the top this is nothing more than an out of the box speculation based on what little I have read. [/FONT]
