MISTRIAL - Sidney Moorer on trial for the kidnapping of Heather Elvis - June 23, 2016 #3

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Anyone clear on what the judge is talking about?
 
OMG! All that fuss about the transcript and KT tells her she can put it away after just 2 questions.
 
All that for those two lame points? Much ado about nothing.
 
Matt Parris WBTW ‏@MattParrisWBTW · 4s4 seconds ago

Warrelmann says she saw an instagram pic of Heather with injuries that she told Warrelmann Jeremy, an abusive ex gave her.
 
Bri clarifying now that SS said he texted up until 3:00 am (or until he went to sleep)

KT asking:
Stalked online by anyone? BW says she has no idea of a stalking incident from an older man. Asking if she spoke to investigator named Steven Brown. Does she recall Instagram photo of broken nose and 2 black eyes, BW says JF was the one who gave them to her. Confirms that she didn't have an "official" relationship with anyone during time with SM or after. HE had sex with "Jarren" (?) in Dec.
 
No questions Bri. If you say you didn't say what's in the transcript, they'll play the audio.
 
What were the questions?
One was about SS texting Heather either until he fell asleep or she stopped responding. I already forgot the 2nd one, Rob. Sorry.
 
WMBF News

Defense asked Warrelmann if she had any knowledge of anyone stalking Elvis online. The witness said no.

The witness is also questioned on cross about Elvis' ex-boyfriend again. Warrelmann said Elvis came to live with her after the former boyfriend kicked her out of his house. Additionally, she recalled seeing a picture on social media in 2012 of Elvis with a broken nose.
 
All that for those two lame points? Much ado about nothing.

I think he's trying to say that SS might have lied about texting her that night. Highly doubt it, and if it didn't show up on her phone records, they probably used snapchat or something.
 
Now talking about messages btwn HE and DH jr. Some emojis (sexual in nature) sent to DHjr from HE.

KT confirms that DH Sr and DH Jr (Goes by DJ) worked at TK. Bri thinks that he was around 19 yrs old at that time. Father in 40s (they think, not confirmed)
State objects when KT asked if BW knew either being a RSO. She says no. Judge overrules objection and allows the question.

KT showing BW a paper. State objects wants to see the paper he is showing her but Judge tells her she will get her turn to see it. It's not in evidence. Judge is not letting the State get a word in.
 
Stick figure ejaculating, lol...KT is really grasping here.
 
"When you say 'junior,' that's the son, correct?" Yes, Truslow. That's what "junior" means. Sigh. Please, waste more of the court's time.
 
What is this bickering between Judge and prosecutor?
 
oh my goodness, this judge..... :tantrum:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
160
Guests online
1,717
Total visitors
1,877

Forum statistics

Threads
606,500
Messages
18,204,750
Members
233,864
Latest member
Puddy
Back
Top